Will Prop. 8 be retroactive? Opinions differ
Jeff Johnson - OneNewsNow - 8/7/2008 10:10:00 AMBookmark and Share

gay marriage certificate CA smallCalifornia Attorney General Jerry Brown says the marriage protection amendment on his state's November ballot will not nullify any homosexual "marriages" created between now and then. But supporters of the amendment say, "Not so fast."

 

Brown told the San Francisco Chronicle that he expects California courts to order that marriages of same-sex couples performed between the May 15 court-ordered legalization of such unions and the November 4 election to continue to be recognized, even if the marriage protection amendment passes. Attorney Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, admits that is a possibility -- but he says it is one Brown has no business raising in his official capacity.
 
"...Jerry Brown is way out of line to make that pronouncement that Proposition 8 is not going to apply to homosexual couples who've already been 'married' in California prior to its passage," Dacus asserts.
 
In fact, says the attorney, Brown's comments are a "clear breach of his public trust" as attorney general. "It's the duty and responsibility of the attorney general to defend the law, to defend the amendments to the constitution, to defend the constitution of this state," he points out. "And for him to prematurely come out and already start to dissolve its strength is very inappropriate."

 

Story continues below ...


Results from our related poll

If California's Prop. 8 passes in November, should all

homosexual 'marriages' recognized by the state since mid-June

-- when licenses were first issued -- be nullified?

08200807a


 
Brad Dacus PJIBrown has no way of knowing how the courts would rule on the "marriages" created by the California Supreme Court prior to the amendment's potential passage, says the Christian attorney.
 
"It is clearly far too early...for the attorney general or for anyone to be pronouncing how the courts will be interpreting the amendment to the state constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman as applied to people who have already been married under that and are homosexuals," states Dacus.
 
According to Dacus, it is still very much "up in the air" how passage of Prop. 8 might affect homosexual couples who were married during the almost five-month period it was legal to do so in the Golden State. "[I]f Proposition 8 passes, we'll have to litigate that in the courts -- and who knows where it could go," he states.
 
The proposed amendment states: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

 

iTunes Podcast

 

Rate this Story (1 Star = Not so Good -and- 5 Stars = Excellent!)

  (average 3 out of 5)


View Comments

Other Stories in Legal and Courts
Senate confirms controversial judge to federal bench
Lawsuit requests people's voice
NJ teen barred from abortion protest sues school
Congressman bribes way into 13-year prison sentence
Supreme Court ignores free speech
ACORN's root for suit?
Terror trials in NYC criticized
ADF pushes for 14th Ft. Hood victim
Churches win in equal access debate
Michigan abortionist under pressure
Commissioners' prayer leads to federal court
1st Amendment shoved aside on Constitution Day
Founder takes charity to court
'Opt out' not an option, says judge
Planned Parenthood seeks silence, fails
Audits on free exercise of religion?
ACLU mum on this church-gov't lawsuit
Christian organization wins attorney’s fees
Courts deem pro-life groups lack standing
ACLU accused of promoting promiscuous lifestyle


If you believe OneNewsNow.com is an important source for Christian news,
please consider a
 
small tax-deductible gift for this service. 





11/21/2009 12:31:54 AM