'Frank' Democrats censor GOP mail
Jim Brown - OneNewsNow - 8/25/2009 8:00:00 AMBookmark and Share

MailboxAn Arizona congressman says liberals on the "Franking Commission" have deliberately tried to censor mail that conservative Republican House members are attempting to send out to their constituents.

 

Democrats on the bipartisan Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards have been blocking Republicans from sending out franked mailings to constituents that refer to the cap-and-trade bill as "cap and tax," the stimulus bill as the "so-called stimulus," and the healthcare reform bill as "socialized medicine."
 
Representative Trent Franks (R-Arizona) says the Franking Commission even told him to stop using the phrase "Democratic majority" in his newsletters, and to use "majority" instead.
 
"For instance, I can say 'the Speaker,' but I can't say 'Speaker Pelosi' because that's too inflammatory. Well, you know, I understand their problem -- they don't want people to really identify the Democratic Party with Nancy Pelosi," he notes. "But the point is, we are forced to change our vernacular and how we say things in order to comport with their attitudes and their way of believing [how] we should say it."
 
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ)

Another Republican member of the House, John Carter of Texas, told Human Events last month the Franking Commission informed him he could not say: "House Democrats unveiled a government-run healthcare plan" -- but instead must use: "The House majority unveiled a public option healthcare plan." That, stated Carter, is "Pelosi-speak."

 

According to Franks, an honest and open debate would put Democrats' agenda "in dire straits."
 
"Ironically, we found franked mail sent from Nancy Pelosi that has exactly the same phrases in it, only from the Democrat side when she was in the minority -- exactly the same that she never was censored for," he adds. "But now that they're in the majority, they're censoring the Republican mail."
 
Franks says for the first time in decades, Republicans have not been able to offer amendments to some of the most critical bills being considered. He points out that Democrats are even trying to create a rule on appropriations bills that would prevent Republicans from offering their amendments.

 

iTunes Podcast

 

Rate this Story (1 Star = Not so Good -and- 5 Stars = Excellent!)

  (average 4.5 out of 5)


View Comments


Other Stories in Politics and Government
U.N. says the world needs fewer children
Spat over mammography guidelines - gov't healthcare at work?
Christian leader fights for public vote on DC gay marriage
Indiana senator shifts left to support Hamilton
'No' to Jesus, 'yes' to Allah
Ohio rep. wants to legalize same-sex marriage
New Hampshire seeks voice
Palin, Winfrey talk about book and Levi Johnston
Votes still being counted in NY special election
Does ACORN trail lead to White House?
RNC will drop abortion coverage
Gold rises, dollar drops
Risky for gov't to subsidize hirings
Is Stupak Amendment effective?
Take from the rich, give to the gov't
WA vote to protect marriage fails, harassment follows
New effort to undermine marriage doomed
Going with the 'real deal' over 'wrong direction'
County censures 'rogue' Republican
Stupak amendment: 'Terrible defeat' for pro-lifers


If you believe OneNewsNow.com is an important source for Christian news,
please consider a
 
small tax-deductible gift for this service. 





11/20/2009 11:36:56 PM