On Wednesday, August 1, Chick-fil-A experienced about triple the normal business from people supporting the opinion in favor of traditional marriage expressed by company CEO Dan Cathy. (See earlier story) But Jacob Meister of The Civil Rights Agenda of Illinois filed a complaint saying the biblical view causes "widespread stigmatization of homosexual individuals." OneNewsNow asked Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute for a response to that claim. "I think it's absurd, and I think it's dangerous," she answers. "I think the way they're interpreting very troublesome language in the Illinois Human Rights Act actually makes this in conflict with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution." Higgins is concerned that the complaint "might fly and be effective." She points to the complaint filed by the homosexual couple. "The couple has said that until Dan Cathy expressed his view on marriage that Chick-fil-A was one of their favorite restaurants to eat in," she says. "So, in other words, they were treated well in the restaurant. They simply don't like his views. His views apparently make them feel bad -- and so they are trying to silence him legally." The First Amendment protects almost all speech, not just the speech one agrees with and approves. Higgins points out too that there has never been a complaint on record that Chick-fil-A has ever discriminated against anyone on the basis of sexual orientation.