Targeting sodas won't eliminate obesity

Wednesday, January 16, 2013
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

One expert suggests that Coca-Cola may not deserve the criticism it is drawing for its new anti-obesity ad.

The two-minute commercial (view below) urges people to "come together on something that concerns all of us: obesity." Coke also makes it known that it now offers nearly 200 low- or no-calorie beverages and that the company has voluntarily changed its drink offerings in schools primarily to water, juices and low- or no-calorie options.

Both efforts have led to a substantial reduction in calorie consumption, according to Coke. The beverage giant also points out that it supports programs that enable young people to get active, while it continues to work with researchers to develop zero-calorie, all-natural sweeteners.

Even so, nutrition professor Barry Popkin of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill tells USA Today, "The Coca-Cola Company still remains one of the major causes of obesity in the USA and globally." Likewise, Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest calls the new ad "a page out of Damage Control 101."

Gunlock

But Julie Gunlock, director of the Women for Food Freedom Project at the Independent Women's Forum (IWF), tells OneNewsNow the anti-soda effort misses the bigger picture.

"When these sort of food nannies, food police, health activists say that, they are trying to push a regulatory agenda," she asserts. "They really have their target set on soda. They want to see it regulated; they want to see it banned; they want to see it taxed. The truth is we can [do all those things], but people will still have availability to extra-large pizzas … macaroni and cheese, and fried chicken -- you name it."

Gunlock goes on to add that the term "consumer advocate" has been taken over by left-wing organizations, along the same lines as "environmental activist."

"Most of these organizations have one goal. It's not to make Americans healthier, or children healthier, or to improve products in the marketplace," the IWF spokesperson notes.

"They have a regulatory agenda -- it is growing government. They see a role for government; they want to see government have more role in what you eat, in the products that you purchase. So a lot of these advocacy groups are no longer sort of just keeping an eye on things."

But as Gunlock reports, regulations generally mean higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to Ted Cruz's speech & non-endorsement of Donald Trump?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump vs. Clinton: Is a 2017 'peaceful transfer' possible?
Obama: Trump's NATO comments show 'lack of preparedness'
Authorities: Munich shooter planned attack for a year
Turkey investigating people who say coup attempt was hoax
Calif. fires threaten thousands of homes; 1 body found
IS attack on Afghan protest kills at least 61, wounds 207
DNC rules meeting agrees to a compromise on superdelegates
Kaine liberal appeal muted by energy ties, abortion concerns
WNBA withdraws fines for teams that wore black warmup shirts

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump pushing for a 'Philly fight?'
Clinton faces new email scandal heading into Convention
McAuliffe to circumvent VA Sup. Ct. ruling on felon voter rights, will issue 200K clemency grants
Syrian kids hold Pokemon go photos to plead with world to 'Come and save me'
Kaine makes Clinton campaign debut amid backlash from the left

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
A look at this year’s Social Security changes

An expert in retirement security is adding his two cents to thoughts on this year's changes with Social Security.