Feds reverse course on new campus speech restrictions

Tuesday, November 26, 2013
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

The Departments of Education and Justice have decided to back away from its highly controversial "blueprint" for defining sexual harassment on college campuses nationwide.

William Creeley of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) says last May the University of Montana, in a settlement agreement with the feds, was required to adopt a sexual harassment policy that was shockingly dangerous to free speech. That policy, he explains, broadly defined sexual harassment as "any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature" – including speech.

"Of course, if applied as the federal government wanted it to be applied, this would cover an immense array of protected speech under the First Amendment, rendering virtually every student and faculty member on campus guilty of sexual harassment," he tells OneNewsNow.

Creeley, FIRE's director of legal and public advocacy, says the pushback from the public against this impending policy was enormous.

Creeley

"As a result of that pushback, I think the policies installed eventually not only at the University of Montana, but also recently agreed to at the State University of New York system, indicate that the Department of Education and the Department of Justice have dialed back their previous requirements," he states.

Creeley says the Departments of Justice and Education had planned to implement this contentious policy on college and university campuses nationwide. And FIRE points out "serious" First Amendment and due process problems remain with the blueprint – such as student discipline and reporting of faculty names who don't attend training on the policies.

"A great deal of work remains to be done," Creeley concludes, "but advocates of free speech and academic freedom on campus should be cheered by this progress."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Of the four media hosts/moderators for the 2016 election debates, which do you most trust to be fair?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Senators vote to override Obama's veto of 9/11 bill
Israel mourns as preparations begin for Peres' funeral
NAACP head wants people to ignore Keith Lamont Scott's past
Moore goes before ethics panel on gay marriage order
Deal reached to keep US government running, help Flint
Clinton hopes Sanders and Michelle Obama can lift campaign
9 states to vote soon on expanding legal access to marijuana

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The real agenda behind Charlotte's 'peaceful' protests: Anti-white, anti-American values
Lester Holt learns his Lauer lesson
The Ferguson effect in Ferguson
Black man who dislikes cops stunned by white trooper's action
AP-GfK Poll: Voters more confident in Trump's health

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Legal battle looms over New Hampshire scholarship program

Atheist groups want to shut down a tax credit scholarship program that is benefitting low-income New Hampshire students.