Parental notification affirmed in Alaska

Wednesday, October 10, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

An Alaska court has upheld most of a voter-approved state law requiring at least one parent to be notified before a minor child can obtain an abortion.

Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest filed suit against the law, which gained voter approval in August 2010. The law provides an option for a judge to bypass the requirement in certain circumstances.

In its decision, the Alaska Superior Court concluded that "minors may be pleasantly surprised when underestimate parents support, comfort, and affirm them" - and that the parental notification law "sufficiently fosters a potential for worthwhile family involvement [and] that it passes constitutional muster...."

Alliance Defending Freedom acted as co-counsel in defending the law. Senior counsel Steven H. Aden tells OneNewsNow "a young girl's well-being is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line."

Aden, Steven (ADF)"Parents care more about their minor girls than an abortionist ever will," he states. "The court was right to recognize that fact, and to recognize that there is an important interest on the part of the state in insuring that parents participate with their minor girls when circumstances like pregnancy arise."

Since 1995, the people of Alaska have voted approval of parental notification with Planned Parenthood using the courts to block it. The court this time heeded direction from the Alaska Supreme Court's previous decision that the state constitution permits a legal plan through which parents are notified so they can be part of the life-changing decision.

The Superior Court upheld the entirety of the law except for two provisions: one that allowed parents to sue in civil court if an abortionist fails to obey the law, and one that required clear and convincing evidence at bypass hearings.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's the strategy behind CAIR using 'Islamaphobia' against its enemies? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  UN body creates post on sexual orientation, gender identity
  About 1.6M drop-outs from health law coverage this year
  Obama quickly signs Puerto Rico financial rescue bill
  Tesla driver killed in crash while using car's 'autopilot'
  Calif. attorney general subpoenas refiners on gas prices
Pentagon ends ban on transgender troops in military
Judge blocks Indiana genetic abnormality abortion law
Report: US sailors ill-prepared for Iran encounter in Gulf

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump: 'I'm running against 2 parties'
Obama administration wants to keep Clinton Foundation emails hidden until late 2018
Google age-discrimination lawsuit could grow
'We're not going to pour money into a black hole': Rubio talks corruption in foreign governments
Russia's proposed law: No evangelizing outside of church

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
38th case filed against HHS mandate

Indiana-based Grote Industries is the latest to file suit against the ObamaCare mandate.