Pro-life laws' defeat 'doesn't make sense'

Friday, December 7, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Two Oklahoma pro-life laws might be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, now that the state's high court has struck both of them down.

The first measure, which passed in 2010, requires that a woman be shown an ultrasound of her baby before she has an abortion. The second, approved in 2011, requires that abortionists follow the FDA protocol in administering abortion drugs like RU-486.

Balch, Mary Spaulding (NRLC)Mary Spaulding Balch of the National Right to Life Committee explains that the Oklahoma court based its decisions on a Supreme Court case titled Pennsylvania v. Casey. In separate decisions, the Oklahoma Supreme Court said the laws, which received wide bipartisan support in the legislature, violated that 1992 Supreme Court case.

"I think they're correct to say that they are bound by the federal law," she notes, "and the United States Supreme Court has said in Casey that the states have the right to regulate abortion. Most particularly, Casey was about informed consent and accurate information."

The ultrasound provides truthful information to the mother -- that what she is considering aborting is a child. So Balch does not think the Oklahoma ruling makes sense.

The second law, which simply says that chemical abortions have to follow federal guidelines, was also struck down.

"When the Supreme Court says that it violates federal law, it doesn't make sense, because they were trying to do that very thing -- to follow the federal law," the pro-lifer reasons.

Balch hopes the Oklahoma attorney general will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, and she believes there is a good chance of winning if the court will hear the case.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Of the four media hosts/moderators for the 2016 election debates, which do you most trust to be fair?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

South Carolina school shooting: 3 wounded; teen in custody
Congress overrides Obama's veto of Sept. 11 bill
Deal reached to keep US government running, help Flint
Alabama justice 'urged defiance, not compliance' on marriage
  Verbal battle breaks out between Baltimore mayor and prosecutor
NAACP head wants people to ignore Keith Lamont Scott's past

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The real agenda behind Charlotte's 'peaceful' protests: Anti-white, anti-American values
Lester Holt learns his Lauer lesson
The Ferguson effect in Ferguson
Black man who dislikes cops stunned by white trooper's action
AP-GfK Poll: Voters more confident in Trump's health

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Mandate challenge left up to lower courts

Though the Supreme Court has declined to intervene, Hobby Lobby will continue its fight against the Health and Human Services mandate that it provide free insurance coverage for abortion-causing drugs.