Good news that SCOTUS will hear marriage cases

Saturday, December 8, 2012
 | 
Jody Brown (OneNewsNow.com)

Several pro-family groups are voicing their approval that the highest court in America has decided it will hear highly contentious and controversial cases involving efforts by homosexual activists to redefine -- and by family advocates to protect -- traditional marriage.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide homosexual marriage issues. The high court's decisions will not be expected until next summer.

Lorence, Jordan (ADF)Jordan Lorence of Alliance Defending Freedom tells OneNewsNow the court will hear arguments on California's Proposition 8 -- the voter-approved constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman -- and on a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defines marriage the same way for the purposes of deciding who can receive a range of federal benefits.

"And we hope that they are going to uphold both of those and say that it is legitimate, constitutional policy to define marriage as one man and woman," he says, "because marriage between a man and a woman is a universal good that diverse cultures and faiths have honored throughout the history of Western civilization."

The National Organization for Marriage is predicting SCOTUS will uphold Prop. 8.

Eastman

"We believe [taking the case] is a strong signal that the court will reverse the lower courts and uphold Proposition 8," says NOM's chairman John Eastman. "That is the right outcome based on the law and based on the principle that voters hold the ultimate power over basic policy judgments and their decisions are entitled to respect."

Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, describes the announcement from the high court as "good news" - but adds that the battle is not just about marriage.

Thomasson, Randy (SaveCalifornia.com)"We're relying on the Supreme Court to uphold the plain reading of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees each state 'a republican form of government' - a government under the written law, not government run by the unconstitutional prejudices of some judges.

"Without question," Thomasson continues, "the Supreme Court should reserve marriage licenses exclusively for one man and one woman, not only for the sake of children and families, but for the sake of our republic."

The Supreme Court is likely to hear arguments in March and hand down decisions in June.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

If Democrats choose Rep. Keith Ellison to head up the DNC, it will ...

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump chooses Ben Carson for HUD secretary
Judge orders Michigan recount to begin today
Gun-rights backers vow to 'go on offense' during Trump years
  North Dakota pipeline protesters vow to stay despite victory
  Mourning, memorials amid probe into fatal warehouse fire
  Italy faces political, economic uncertainty after referendum

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Is Trump giving a platform to 'white supremacists'?
The Charlotte cop charged in the death of a suspect was acquitted for good reason
Race warriors decry ‘White Jesus’
Dems, other numbskulls plot 'resistance' to election outcome
Laughing at liberals as they lose their minds

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Mandate challenge left up to lower courts

Though the Supreme Court has declined to intervene, Hobby Lobby will continue its fight against the Health and Human Services mandate that it provide free insurance coverage for abortion-causing drugs.