Prop. 8 in the high court

Wednesday, December 12, 2012
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A family advocate is concerned that the nation's highest court will overrule the will of voters, the Constitution and majority vote in order to advance the "gay" agenda.

Homosexual couples fear that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to take up the Proposition 8 case may actually delay national recognition of "gay marriage." They are concerned that most states have a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and that the high court does not have a reputation of advancing controversial social issues.

Quinlan, Greg (PFOX)But Greg Quinlan, president of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX), does not think those fears are reasonable.

"We are in a very precarious situation right now, so I don't know that the fears are justified from homosexual activists now who are afraid that the court won't use this to change the course of this nation and our ethics," Quinlan comments.

Some same-sex couples in California "married" in 2004 during a brief window when San Francisco allowed such unions, but those were ultimately invalidated. In 2008, the California Supreme Court allowed homosexual marriage in the state, until voters passed Proposition 8 that same year.

"We're seeing over and over again that there are places where the Constitution doesn't matter, the will of the people doesn't matter, majority vote doesn't matter," the PFOX president notes. "So I am concerned about the direction we are headed."

But Quinlan believes the strategy of the lawyers opposing California's marriage initiative shows that they may be apt to lose this case.

Ted Olson and David Boies, the two lawyers famous for defending same-sex couples in California's Proposition 8 case, say they will seek a broad ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court. The two have pledged to "address all issues" during the hearing, but focus on the rights of homosexual couples to marry. Boies and Olsen say they are not concerned about losing their case before the nation's highest court.

lesbian marriage"Mr. Olsen and his colleague are doing everything that they can to normalize homosexual behavior, which is an attack on society as a whole and on our faith," the PFOX president contends.

If the U.S. Supreme Court had refused to hear the Prop. 8 case, same-sex marriage would have been legal once again in California.

"As for the strategy, we have seen a flood of homosexual activism on every aspect of the spectrum to change public opinion, to attack the norms about human sexuality in general, and about a person's rights to even affirm their own right of self-determination," the family advocate notes.

If the Supreme Court does not rule in favor of homosexual marriage, activists plan to push back a decision from the high court to allow such unions nationwide. They are preparing another initiative for the 2014 California ballot.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What bothers you most about Huma Abedin's connection with radical Islam?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Syrian rebels advance on Kurds as Turkish strikes kill 35
German economy minister says EU-US trade talks have failed
Locally transmitted Zika virus infects 41 in Singapore
Gender inequality costs sub-Saharan Africa $95B: UN
Iran confirms arrest of member of negotiation team with West
Latest: Sheriff: Suspect confessed to nuns' killing
Mother charged in drowning death of son in central Ala.
3rd suspect in NM girl's horrific death held on bail

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton lead drops from 9 pts to 3 in just 3 weeks
Trump vows to deport 'criminal illegal immigrants ... within one hour' of swearing-in
Pence: Trump's position and principles 'have been absolutely consistent'
Greg Laurie: God doesn't send people to hell; They send themselves
Trump talks tough on immigration: Deporting criminal illegals 'on day one'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Mandate challenge left up to lower courts

Though the Supreme Court has declined to intervene, Hobby Lobby will continue its fight against the Health and Human Services mandate that it provide free insurance coverage for abortion-causing drugs.