Despite legal setbacks, traditional marriage still upheld in California

Thursday, July 25, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-family leader in California vows to continue defending traditional marriage even after the state's highest court refused to halt homosexual "marriages" in the state. 

"We continue to make our stand on biblical principles and values, that marriage is to be between one man and one woman,” says Patricia Thompson, director of the Central California chapter of Concerned Women For America.  

The California Supreme Court decided in a 6-0 vote to reject a lawsuit by a county clerk who argued that Proposition 8 is still in effect. San Diego County clerk Ernest J. Dronenburg Jr. argued that county clerks are being forced to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples in violation of California law.

Thompson

The court, in a closed session on Wednesday, rejected Dronenburg's bid for a stay on "gay marriages."

Grassroots-driven Proposition 8, which passed in 2008, amended the California Constitution to state that California recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman.

Prop. 8 was overruled by a homosexual federal judge, and it was struck another blow in June when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law’s defenders did not have “standing” in their courtroom. California officials - notably, Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris - had refused to defend the law in court, leaving that task to proponents of Prop. 8.

Although the high court’s decision technically did not strike down Prop. 8, liberal activists claimed otherwise, while county clerks such as Dronenburg argued they were being forced to break a state law.

Prop. 8 proponents also argue the federal judge's ruling affects only the counties under the court's jurisdiction, not the entire state. Out of California's 58 counties, clerks from 24 counties have opposed Proposition 8.

The California Supreme Court will decide on whether to revive Proposition 8 in August, at the earliest.

"We had several opportunities to let our voice be heard on this issue,” says Thompson, "and the voice of the people is very, very clear."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why are Millennials attracted to Bernie Sanders' candidacy? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump and Sanders declared the victors in New Hampshire
Kim Davis obeying orders in gay marriage case, judges rules
Sup. Court puts Obama's Clean Power Plan on hold
Obama admin says it won't use Ebola funding to combat Zika
Conservative opposition threatens criminal justice overhaul
UN experts: N. Korea continues to evade UN sanctions
Obama budget proposes $2.6 trillion in tax increases
Train crash in Germany kills at least 10, injures 80

LATEST FROM THE WEB

San Diego now banishes 'Founding Fathers'
Crushed in New Hampshire: Hillary’s use of the gender card isn’t working
'White guilt' video shown to high school students irks community
TSA: Total security abyss
Why do Black Lives Matter protesters hate ice skating?

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Court rejects Mayor Bloomberg's soda ban, but those pockets are deep

An appeals court ruling that struck down New York City's big-soda ban is a victory for food freedom and New Yorkers, says a critic of the ban. But don't count out Mayor Bloomberg just yet, she adds.