Despite legal setbacks, traditional marriage still upheld in California

Thursday, July 25, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-family leader in California vows to continue defending traditional marriage even after the state's highest court refused to halt homosexual "marriages" in the state. 

"We continue to make our stand on biblical principles and values, that marriage is to be between one man and one woman,” says Patricia Thompson, director of the Central California chapter of Concerned Women For America.  

The California Supreme Court decided in a 6-0 vote to reject a lawsuit by a county clerk who argued that Proposition 8 is still in effect. San Diego County clerk Ernest J. Dronenburg Jr. argued that county clerks are being forced to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples in violation of California law.

Thompson

The court, in a closed session on Wednesday, rejected Dronenburg's bid for a stay on "gay marriages."

Grassroots-driven Proposition 8, which passed in 2008, amended the California Constitution to state that California recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman.

Prop. 8 was overruled by a homosexual federal judge, and it was struck another blow in June when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law’s defenders did not have “standing” in their courtroom. California officials - notably, Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris - had refused to defend the law in court, leaving that task to proponents of Prop. 8.

Although the high court’s decision technically did not strike down Prop. 8, liberal activists claimed otherwise, while county clerks such as Dronenburg argued they were being forced to break a state law.

Prop. 8 proponents also argue the federal judge's ruling affects only the counties under the court's jurisdiction, not the entire state. Out of California's 58 counties, clerks from 24 counties have opposed Proposition 8.

The California Supreme Court will decide on whether to revive Proposition 8 in August, at the earliest.

"We had several opportunities to let our voice be heard on this issue,” says Thompson, "and the voice of the people is very, very clear."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How do you suspect The Associated Press is reacting to media backlash over its Clinton story? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump heading to Mexico in advance of immigration speech
  Arizona old-guard Republicans advance in primary
Latest: Rep. Wasserman Schultz beats primary challenge
Rubio wins Fla. Senate primary, but fight ahead to keep seat
  Polish minister: We will not expose our country to terrorism
  Hurricane churns toward Hawaii; people stock up, board up

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Hillary cartoonist fires back at racism claim
No-loitering policies are welcomed by residents in high-crime areas
IRS doesn’t tell 1M taxpayers that illegals stole their Social Security numbers
Elderly woman beaten, set on fire in black-on-white attack
Chicago’s murder rate spirals out of control

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Court rejects Mayor Bloomberg's soda ban, but those pockets are deep

An appeals court ruling that struck down New York City's big-soda ban is a victory for food freedom and New Yorkers, says a critic of the ban. But don't count out Mayor Bloomberg just yet, she adds.