ACLJ: Obama, Dems, media complicit in IRS targeting scandal

Wednesday, October 23, 2013
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A Christian law firm is expanding its lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, saying the agency’s “intimidation campaign” against conservative organizations is more politically motivated and coordinated than previously thought.

The American Center for Law and Justice announced on Friday it has filed a second amended lawsuit in federal court in Washington, DC, adding additional defendants. David French, senior counsel for the ACLJ, says additional evidence reveals a politically motivated attack on conservative and tea party groups by the IRS because of their political beliefs.

"It really is astonishing when you put together the complete timeline how much IRS action followed directly after some very ugly, very targeted statements by the president of the United States,” the attorney tells OneNewsNow.

French, David (ACLJ)The amended complaint contends that public comments by President Obama – in conjunction with a “climate of hostility” created by congressional Democrats and the media – pressured the IRS to adopt a more rigorous standard for conservatives when applying for tax-exempt status than was applied to liberal organizations. That pressure, asserts ACLJ, made it impossible for their clients to exercise their First Amendment freedoms and “set the stage for the unprecedented, illegal targeting” by the IRS.

The lawsuit, French explains, wants to guarantee accountability from the Internal Revenue Service.

"We have seen that the IRS has a vindictive streak. The IRS is undeterred by things like the Constitution and federal law in pursuing its vindictive streak,” he says. “So we're wanting to make sure there is adult supervision on the IRS and that there is a judicial order preventing them from taking negative action against these conservative groups."

While some progress has been made, French says an inexcusable number of organizations are still facing the same level of scrutiny that they were facing before – with the same lack of progress.

In the lawsuit, ACLJ continues to represent 41 organizations in 22 states. Of those 41, 22 have been granted tax-exempt status (after lengthy delays) and 12 are still pending. ACLJ says five withdrew their applications due to frustrations with the IRS process, two had their files closed by the IRS after the groups refused to answer unconstitutional requests for more information.

Related column on Fox News by ACLJ chief counsel Jay Sekulow:
Obama’s fingerprints all over IRS Tea Party scandal

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why are Millennials attracted to Bernie Sanders' candidacy? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump and Sanders declared the victors in New Hampshire
Kim Davis obeying orders in gay marriage case, judges rules
Sup. Court puts Obama's Clean Power Plan on hold
Obama admin says it won't use Ebola funding to combat Zika
Conservative opposition threatens criminal justice overhaul
UN experts: N. Korea continues to evade UN sanctions
Obama budget proposes $2.6 trillion in tax increases
Train crash in Germany kills at least 10, injures 80

LATEST FROM THE WEB

NH Primary Update: Trump 35%, Kasich 16%; Sanders 60%, Hillary 38%
Lawsuit alleges Gospel for Asia fraudulently solicited hundreds of millions in donations, enriched leader
NH results: All eyes on Trump, GOP establishment
Independents voting for Trump, NH exit polls show
PC-USA on track to lose over 400K members by 2020

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Webcam abortions nearing end in Iowa?

Planned Parenthood is challenging Iowa officials in court over webcam abortions.