Eliminating tax-free housing benefit for pastors would hurt small churches

Wednesday, November 27, 2013
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Pastors need not be concerned in the short run about a decision declaring their housing allowance unconstitutional – that's the advice from the founder of Liberty Counsel.

The decision was handed down Monday by a federal judge in Madison, Wisconsin, who wrote that the exemption "provides a benefit to religious persons and no one else, even though doing so is not necessary to alleviate a special burden on religious exercise." The Freedom From Religion Foundation filed the suit, arguing that the law unconstitutionally establishes religion.

Staver, Mat (Liberty Counsel)Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver is familiar with the judge in the case: Federal Judge Barbara Crabb.

"This particular judge in the past has been known to be someone who sides with groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation on these Establishment Clause cases," he tells OneNewsNow. "So it's not surprising that the judge came to this particular decision."

In 2010, Crabb ruled the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional, but that was overturned on appeal.

Staver, who says the exemption doesn't establish a religion, as FFRF argues, adds that the housing allowance is beneficial – particularly to small congregations.

"Many of these churches are small and they don't have the funds to pay clergy," the attorney points out. "And so consequently, one of the ways that they're able to provide housing and benefits and to actually have a minister is to have this housing allowance – and if this housing exemption is taken away, it's going to affect a lot of small congregations across the country."

Staver says there have been conversations about establishing a cap – for example, a church paying a pastor $100,000 a year or more disqualified from the deduction. He says that could set the groundwork for a discussion, but the ruling by Judge Crabb seeks to have them banned for everyone.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why does the Left ignore problems that continue despite government-led 'solutions' ? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Mexico: 20 gunmen killed in shootouts in Veracruz
Ohio 'heartbeat' abortion bill heads to governor's desk
Earthquake rocks Indonesia's Aceh province; at least 25 dead
GOP adds measure to aid Mattis' confirmation to stopgap bill
7 dead in latest China mine blast; 60 miners killed in week
Trump threatens to cancel Boeing Air Force One contract
Report says Pentagon disregarded cost-cutting study
Justices uphold Katrina fraud verdict against State Farm

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Forget Fox News, Media Matters declares war on new targets
House GOP adds Mattis waiver to must-pass bill
Mattis says he's 'grateful' to be nominated as defense secretary; House GOP introduces waiver language
Comcast sparks row after axing Word network for media company owned by black pastor who iinterviewed Trump
Government report confirms abstinence works

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
It's Texas vs. the EEOC re: hiring rules

The attorney general of Texas is taking the federal government to court over hiring guidelines that could negatively impact public and private employers.