ACLJ: House needs to act against Lerner because Holder sure won't

Tuesday, April 15, 2014
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A constitutional law firm says the decision last week by a House committee to hold a former IRS official in contempt of Congress is justified.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is holding former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for failing to cooperate with congressional investigators to provide information regarding her role in the unlawful targeting of conservative and tea party groups. The 21-12 vote on Thursday to hold Lerner in contempt was along party lines – all Republicans in favor, all Democrats opposed.

ACLJ logoMatthew Clark is an associate counsel with the American Center for Law and Justice, which represents 41 organizations targeted by the IRS during the 2012 presidential campaign cycle. Clark says holding Lerner in contempt of Congress was the appropriate move by the committee.

"[It has been] 11 months now since she first announced that the IRS did something wrong," he points out. "But yet she has delayed, she has defied Congress at every move, she's refused to answer questions, and she's refused to comply with Congress's subpoena."

The action by the Oversight and Government Reform Committee came right on the heels of a vote by the House Ways and Means Committee to ask the Justice Department to file criminal charges against Lerner. The ACLJ attorney says depending on the DOJ is a waste of time.

"As we've seen with this Justice Department and the lack of a true thorough impartial investigation into this case, it's most likely it will have to be congressional action to enforce this," he says.

Clark also notes that if the entire House approves the contempt of Congress charges against Lerner, the House can initiate a civil lawsuit against the former IRS official.

Collecting taxes and conservative scalps, IRS-style
(related commentary by Robert Knight)

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Is it fair to blame President Obama for much of the racial tension now in America?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Takata troubles worsen as truck explodes, kills Texas woman
Clinton aide leaving husband after another sexting scandal
Mylan launching cheaper, generic version of EpiPen
2 slain nuns remembered for 'Christian love in action'
What would Clinton do with mounting Obamacare crisis?
Iran deploys S-300 air defense around nuclear site

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Hillary is a desperate bigot
School defends 'ban' on U.S. flag at football game; 'Because it might offend Hispanic community'
Claims of 'racism' are the last refuge of a shrill harridan
Louisiana flood victims see less public support compared to Sandy, Katrina
Sheriff Clarke: Democrats 'moved black people from cotton fields ... into American ghettos for political power'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Just 5 words would disarm the public

An attorney with Liberty Counsel doesn't think much of a former Supreme Court justice's idea of modifying the Constitution to deprive Americans of their constitutional right to bear arms.