YouTube's double standard

Friday, October 12, 2012
 | 
Russ Jones (OneNewsNow.com)

YouTube has reportedly caved to pressure from the White House to block the controversial Innocence of Muslims video in several nations -- a film the Obama administration falsely claimed incited the recent violence in Benghazi. One group is calling the move "hypocrisy."

With a new report, the Media Research Center's (MRC) Culture and Media Institute maintains there is a double standard when it comes to what is acceptable on the Internet. Meanwhile, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California) and the House Oversight Committee are investigating security lapses at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Gainor, Dan (MRC)Dan Gainor, vice president of business and culture for MRC, finds it odd that the Obama administration does not assert the same power to remove the Taliban's propaganda videos that encourage Islamist violence.

"They're working on two sets of standards here: The American free speech standard, which is almost an 'anything goes' standard -- not entirely, but almost," Gainor states.

"So [for] the terrorists, we don't censor anything that they want to do. They've got their own channel … they're okay. But American free speech is being limited by these same people who are allegedly pro-free speech ..."

According to the MRC spokesman, the "administration's YouTube hypocrisy" is more proof of efforts to silence conservative ideology.

"We are embracing what's called the heckler's veto, except with deadly consequences now," he warns. "It happens to conservatives all the time … someone like Ann Coulter [or David Horowitz] goes to an event, and a few loony lefties show up, and they create a disruption, or they shout down the speaker. And then the speaker says Oh, sorry we have to cancel this because there's too much of a problem here. What they do [is] they silence the speech they don't support."

YouTube confirms it has blocked access to the movie trailer in Egypt and Libya.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why does it appear many Democrats are downplaying the Benghazi findings? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Suspected IS suicide bombers kill at least 36 at Istanbul airport
Shooting at Arizona courthouse claims 2 women
Dems demand gun votes, loudly, in 2-min. House sesson
Voters to decide whether to legalize recreational marijuana
Lawmakers promise to complete rescue package for Puerto Rico
House GOP report blames slow response for Benghazi deaths
Obama judge strikes down Mississippi religious freedom law

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump on terrorism: 'You have to fight fire with fire'
'An ominous sign': Sup. Ct. rejects Washington pharmacists' religious liberty complaint
Clinton claims House Benghazi report 'found nothing,' says time to ‘move on’
No, threatening to kill a U.S. Senator isn't how you start a conversation on gun control
Let's treat Muslims like Obama treats whites

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
'Fox hunting'

Fox News Channel achieved yet another milestone this month when nearly 11.5 million viewers watched the third and final presidential debate Monday -- an accomplishment that has placed many left-leaning pundits on the attack.