Plan to lower standards for women in combat strictly political, says critic

Tuesday, June 18, 2013
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A conservative military watchdog says the newly announced plan to allow women in front-line combat units will do nothing but degrade tough training standards.

Under the schedules delivered to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Army will develop standards within the next two years to let women train and possibly serve as Rangers. By March 2016, women could begin training as Navy SEALS. U.S. Special Operations Command is working on deciding what commando jobs could be opened to women and when the transition would take place.

The plans require women and men to meet the same physical and mental standards to qualify for the front-line positions. It is still possible that women will be kept out of some jobs if research and testing find that they could not be successful in sufficient numbers.

Donnelly

Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness (CMR), tells OneNewsNow therein lies the problem.

"General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, said in January that all standards will be questioned if they are 'so high that a women couldn't make it,' using his words," she points out. "The all-male units that we're talking about today should remain all-male - that's the only way to keep those standards high and commensurate with the demands of direct ground combat."

The military services are also working to determine the cost of opening certain jobs to women, particularly aboard a variety of Navy ships, including some submarines and small warships. Costs for accommodating such a change would be "incalculable," says Donnelly.

"You can't take a small submarine and stretch it like a limousine - and you have the health costs and the operational issues [as well]," she explains. "The Department of the Navy has just disregarded and brushed aside all these arguments that are based on reality, and they're just pursuing political objectives."

The CMR leader believes Congress must intervene.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's the strategy behind CAIR using 'Islamaphobia' against its enemies? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

UN body creates post on sexual orientation, gender identity
About 1.6M drop-outs from health law coverage this year
Obama quickly signs Puerto Rico financial rescue bill
Tesla driver killed in crash while using car's 'autopilot'
Calif. attorney general subpoenas refiners on gas prices
Pentagon ends ban on transgender troops in military
Judge blocks Indiana genetic abnormality abortion law
Report: US sailors ill-prepared for Iran encounter in Gulf

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump: 'I'm running against 2 parties'
Obama administration wants to keep Clinton Foundation emails hidden until late 2018
Google age-discrimination lawsuit could grow
'We're not going to pour money into a black hole': Rubio talks corruption in foreign governments
Russia's proposed law: No evangelizing outside of church

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
After DOMA ruling, Pentagon will extend multiple benefits to homosexual couples

A military watchdog says this week's U.S. Supreme Court decision related to the Defense of Marriage Act will have an immediate and expensive impact on America's armed forces.