Benefit program wrongfully representing taxpayers

Friday, September 21, 2012
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Alarm bells are ringing in response to a Senate report that shows 25 percent of Social Security disability benefits were improperly awarded. But one non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers isn't overly shocked.

According to Pete Sepp, executive vice president of the National Taxpayers Union (NTU), it should come as a surprise to no one that there are improper payments throughout the federal government's benefit program.

Sepp, Pete (NTU)"What is news is how high the improper payment rate is in the disability programs; and worse, how many problems the federal administrative law system is contributing to the improper payment and the taxpayer waste abuse problem," he asserts.

The findings conclude an 18-month investigation by the Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Three-hundred cases between 2006 and 2010 were selected randomly.

"Every time benefits are wrongly awarded, the cost to taxpayers is at least $300,000," Sepp relays. "That's the lifetime benefit that a typical disability recipient ends up getting."

He contends the entire process for approving disability benefits deserves scrutiny, as the report found cases in which benefits were awarded solely on a one-page document that was filled out the day before a hearing. Also, a person who was disabled as of April 2007 for carpal tunnel syndrome was working as a bartender several months later. There are even instances of people driving automobiles after claiming severe arm injuries.

"It has almost become mechanical on the part of many administrative law judges to just take a quick peek at some documentation, perhaps not even ask questions of the people at the hearings, and just rubber-stamp the benefits," Sepp concludes. "That's in large part, I think, because what we're talking about here is other people's money -- and the other people are the American taxpayers. They are not being adequately represented in this process."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to Ted Cruz's speech & non-endorsement of Donald Trump?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

DNC rules meeting agrees to a compromise on superdelegates
Kaine liberal appeal muted by energy ties, abortion concerns
WNBA withdraws fines for teams that wore black warmup shirts
5 dead in Texas apartment complex shooting including suspect
Power restored to National Mall, some museums still closed
IS attack on Afghan protest kills at least 61, wounds 207
Floods kill at least 154 across China, leave scores missing
Turkey seizes over 2,250 institutions in post-coup crackdown
Alaska parental notification abortion law struck down

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Kaine makes Clinton campaign debut amid backlash from the left
Failed coup in Turkey an end times marker?
ISIS takes credit for deadly explosion in Kabul
Hillary to challenge Black Lives Matter with Tuesday DNC program
Trump trying to drive wedge between liberals over Dem VP pick Kaine

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Institute fears U.N. treaty could be pro-abortion

A United Nations treaty working its way through the U.S. Senate reveals a hidden agenda that could be dangerous to children in the womb.