Another blind ObamaCare implementation

Wednesday, January 9, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A healthcare advocate contends that the government shouldn't have proposed new rules for ObamaCare at the end of the year, when Americans were busy celebrating the holidays.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced four proposed rules for ObamaCare during the holiday season, placing them up for public review and comments between Thanksgiving and the New Year and giving a minimum of 30 days for evaluation.

Brase, Twila (CCHF)Twila Brase, president of the Citizens' Council for Health Freedom (CCHF), reports that the proposals included new rules for insurance fees, a requirement for exchanges to offer national health plans, and guidelines to increase costs and include higher premiums.

"This is bad for the public process. There is reason why we have the Administrative Procedures Act that requires the administration to give the public long enough to actually read, digest, and respond to the regulations in order to protect the American people from regulators doing some things that are outside the law or going further than they should," Brase submits.

"They should issue rules only at a time when they know that the public has the time to read them and the time to respond to them," the CCHF president continues. "Otherwise, the public is just getting another implementation of ObamaCare that we have to pass before we can actually know what's in it."

Although the review period was short, Brase says many Americans urged the HHS to extend it for better review of the nearly 750 pages of new material. Her group hopes to obtain that.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How will LGBT supporters respond to the Johns Hopkins study? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

FBI investigates attack; suspect shouted 'Allahu akbar'
Foundation donors who met, talked with Clinton
Seoul: North Korea fires submarine-launched missile
Latest: Trump pays tribute to border patrol agents
Civil rights groups defend mosque, cemetery outside Atlanta
Clinton e-mail scandal builds with new evidence of Foundation connections
States file another lawsuit over Obama transgender rules
FBI probing stabbing where suspect shouted 'Allahu akbar'

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Clinton featured on insider threats training slide For U.S. Army
Multiple donors to Clinton Foundation met with her while at State Department
Right on cue: Establishment uses Putin dog-whistle as similarities to Brexit campaign deepen
Pastor who says single Christians can have 'mutually pleasurable' sex doesn't see Bible as God's infallible Word
On modern anti-Semitism, Christian silence is complicity

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Advice for Rick Perry re: refunding excess tax money

An economist sees an issue in Texas Governor Rick Perry's push to refund tax money it collects but does not spend.