'Hitler would be proud' of California

Tuesday, January 8, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

In the opinion of one California pro-lifer, a new law that allows nurses to perform abortions in The Golden State is a move to expand a "death agenda."

Thomasson, Randy (SaveCalifornia.com)The UCSF pilot project, made legal through SB 623, allows nurse practitioners, nurse midwives and physician assistants to continue performing non-surgical, aspiration abortions through January 2014. Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, says this helps the abortion industry accomplish its goal.

"The abortion industry wants more death of babies. They want doctors to do it, but not enough doctors are willing these days, and so they are recruiting nurses to kill babies," he explains. "They want to perfect this practice. I think Adolf Hitler and his henchmen would be proud."

The Life Legal Defense Foundation has reported an 80-percent increase in complications when non-physicians perform abortions (see earlier story). The pro-life group has also noted that physicians who wrote up the training guide were disciplined by the medical board. Even so, the dangerous program will continue.

"The abortion industry will continually push a death agenda, and they will extend the pilot project to expand it or make it permanent," Thomasson asserts. "It shows the face and the agenda of the Democrats."

The first phase of the pilot project serviced 8,000 women.

SB 623 is one of several new state laws that Thomasson says is making the state less family-friendly.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Evangelical Hispanics will be the deciding factor in determining who the next president is – agree or disagree?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Rowdy protests but no violence this time outside Trump rally
Elizabeth Warren emerges as potent Clinton ally, Trump foil
Church slaying families accept pursuit of death penalty
United Auto Workers union endorses Hillary
3rd person charged in investigation of coal exec's death
South Carolina Gov. signs 20-week abortion ban
State Dept. audit faults Clinton in emails
Wisconsin company sued over break policy for Muslim workers

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Republicans seize on St. Dept.'s audit to challenge Clinton's repeated claims on emails
Glenn Beck guest: 'What patriot' will remove Trump from office?
US Senate approves $800M fund to compensate Pakistan for war
This new religion is causing an existential crisis at American colleges, universities, NYU prof says
A response to my conservative #NeverTrump friends

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Making an option a requirement

As Washington state lawmakers consider a bill that would force coverage of abortion, a pro-lifer asserts that proponents of such language will have a fight on their hands.