'Hitler would be proud' of California

Tuesday, January 8, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

In the opinion of one California pro-lifer, a new law that allows nurses to perform abortions in The Golden State is a move to expand a "death agenda."

Thomasson, Randy (SaveCalifornia.com)The UCSF pilot project, made legal through SB 623, allows nurse practitioners, nurse midwives and physician assistants to continue performing non-surgical, aspiration abortions through January 2014. Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, says this helps the abortion industry accomplish its goal.

"The abortion industry wants more death of babies. They want doctors to do it, but not enough doctors are willing these days, and so they are recruiting nurses to kill babies," he explains. "They want to perfect this practice. I think Adolf Hitler and his henchmen would be proud."

The Life Legal Defense Foundation has reported an 80-percent increase in complications when non-physicians perform abortions (see earlier story). The pro-life group has also noted that physicians who wrote up the training guide were disciplined by the medical board. Even so, the dangerous program will continue.

"The abortion industry will continually push a death agenda, and they will extend the pilot project to expand it or make it permanent," Thomasson asserts. "It shows the face and the agenda of the Democrats."

The first phase of the pilot project serviced 8,000 women.

SB 623 is one of several new state laws that Thomasson says is making the state less family-friendly.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Of the four media hosts/moderators for the 2016 election debates, which do you most trust to be fair?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Officials: Firefighter halts teen who killed father, shot 3
  Israelis pay respects to Peres, Clinton arrives in Israel
Officials: Suspect in Texas slayings was in US illegally
Tropical Storm Matthew lashes islands of eastern Caribbean
Some evacuation orders lifted in Calif. wildfire areas
House OKs plan for $170M to fix Flint water system

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Mainstream media covers kids who pillage and plunder; but not kids who pray
Student suspended for anti-gun control video
The anti-police bandwagon in Charlotte
Christian school goes to court to defend a 30-second pregame prayer
Guy brings 'All Lives Matter' sign into black neighborhood, gets beaten up

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Making an option a requirement

As Washington state lawmakers consider a bill that would force coverage of abortion, a pro-lifer asserts that proponents of such language will have a fight on their hands.