Congress slaps lucrative trafficking website

Friday, March 18, 2016
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

working on a laptop computer 620x300An online advertising service that peddles trafficked women, men, and children may soon run up a huge bill for legal expenses – and the U.S. Senate may be pursuing further steps to make sure that happens.

A Senate panel was conducting a hearing to look into sex traffickers using Backpage.com to post ads and sell the victims for illicit purposes – but Carl Ferrer, CEO of Backpage, decided to skip the hearing. His absence, says the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, clearly shows the website is "unapologetic about its business model [which is] based on sexual exploitation."

The NCOSE's Haley Halverson tells OneNewsNow the Senate has now expressed its contempt – literally – for Backpage.com. "It was found in contempt of Congress 96-0," she emphasizes. "So it was a landslide decision – and we're hoping that it leads to more accountability for Backpage in the future as well."

In response to the contempt citation, reports the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Backpage has said essentially "bring it on."

Halverson

Halverson explains why an online source might participate in selling women and children, knowing full well that trafficking is illegal.

"At minimum, they're making at least $39 million from their online prostitution ads. Backpage knows what it's doing," she asserts. "It owns several explicit websites that sell women for sex – I mean, that's all. The only difference is that Backpage might sell a few lamps. A lot of sex trafficking is happening on their website."

According to Halverson, law enforcement officials are finding minors advertised on the website on a regular basis.

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation is hopeful the contempt citation will lead to even more serious steps as the Senate panel pursues its investigation and that that is another step towards taking Backpage to task, legally.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why does it appear many Democrats are downplaying the Benghazi findings? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Suspected IS suicide bombers kill at least 36 at Istanbul airport
Shooting at Arizona courthouse claims 2 women
Dems demand gun votes, loudly, in 2-min. House sesson
Voters to decide whether to legalize recreational marijuana
Lawmakers promise to complete rescue package for Puerto Rico
House GOP report blames slow response for Benghazi deaths
Obama judge strikes down Mississippi religious freedom law

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump on terrorism: 'You have to fight fire with fire'
'An ominous sign': Sup. Ct. rejects Washington pharmacists' religious liberty complaint
Clinton claims House Benghazi report 'found nothing,' says time to ‘move on’
No, threatening to kill a U.S. Senator isn't how you start a conversation on gun control
Let's treat Muslims like Obama treats whites

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Healthcare.gov database at risk, says GAO

hand on computer keyboardA new report finds action is needed to enhance information security and privacy controls at Healthcare.gov.