The healthcare premium pattern

Friday, January 18, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

To understand whether ObamaCare will actually drive down healthcare costs, a Christian activist says it's important to take a look back at history.

Merrill Matthews and Mark E. Litow warn in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece that ObamaCare mandates will drive up the cost of health insurance premiums in individual markets. The two note that in the mid-1990s, eight states -- New Jersey, New York, Maine, New Hampshire, Washington, Kentucky, Vermont and Massachusetts -- required health insurers to accept every applicant and to charge a common premium for those insured. As a result, premiums skyrocketed.

So even though President Obama promised that premiums for a family would be lower after his first term in office, prices are actually now $3,000 higher.

Hebron, Lawrence (Alliance of Christian Patriots)Lawrence Hebron of the Alliance of Christian Patriots tells OneNewsNow the government follows a pattern when it gets involved in health insurance.

"Up until about four years ago, what healthcare stories dominated the news? Well, there were the problems with Medicare, the problems with the veterans healthcare system, and the high cost of insurance," he notes.

"Who runs Medicare? That would be the federal government. Who administers the veterans hospitals and related healthcare? Oh, that's the federal government also. Well, who regulates the healthcare insurance industry and is responsible for the high cost there? Oh, that would be the federal and state governments. Do you see a pattern here?"

Since ObamaCare requires guaranteed issue, community rating, and forces insurance to fund uncovered medical conditions, Matthews warns that premiums will "shoot up" and that "some may even double." Major employers will not see a significant increase, while small businesses will encounter a higher increase. The individual market will be hit the hardest.

States that do have signature ObamaCare mandates typically have higher premiums than states that do not.

Merrill Matthews is a resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation. Mark Litow is a retired actuary and past chairman of the Social Insurance Public Finance Section of the Society Actuaries.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to a federal judge blocking Trump's order withholding funding for uncooperative 'sanctuary cities'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump tax plan leaves Congress, Ryan with heavy lift
Texas poised to pass 'sanctuary city' ban with jail penalty
  Trump says Mexico, Canada opposed NAFTA pull-out
  Syrian media: Israel attacked installation near Damascus
IRS, postal inspectors raid Benny Hinn Ministries

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Christian university must celebrate ‘panromantic’ gender identity, LGBTQ students demand
Dad sent to prison for homeschooling his kids
NYT op-ed argues rioters have been in the right
How Hillary doomed her ‘inevitable presidency’
At cowardly Berkeley, the mob wins again

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
A look at this year’s Social Security changes

An expert in retirement security is adding his two cents to thoughts on this year's changes with Social Security.