Researchers study Social Security and working moms

Tuesday, October 31, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

two business womenA study on Social Security and motherhood is being viewed as yet another reason to take a look at the system overall. 

Researchers at Boston College reviewed how much motherhood costs women in Social Security benefits. They found that, among other things, mothers with one child receive 16 percent less in benefits than non-mothers, and each additional child reduces benefits by another two percent.

"The motherhood penalty is almost negligible among women receiving spousal benefits," the researchers stated, "but mothers who receive benefits on only their own earnings histories see significantly lower Social Security income."

Lukas

Before jumping to any conclusions that the Social Security Administration is sexist or biased, Carrie Lukas of the Independent Women's Forum says the figures related to what she calls an "arbitrary" formula.

"It has some strange factors to it and that in some ways it's actually titled towards stay-at-home moms," she says. "If you're a married woman and you don't work, you can get 50 percent of what your husband's benefits are, and you earned that even though you didn't contribute to Social Security during your own lifetime."

If a woman worked but earned only half of her husband's earnings, Lukas continues, she will get the same benefits as a woman who never paid in to Social Security.

Lukas says she remains interested in moving towards a savings-based retirement system.

"Or just make it so some of those unfairnesses are ironed out and it truly becomes something that is linked exclusively with how much you put in," she says.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you respond if a basketball player continued to warm-up during the national anthem?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Pro-family supporters rally for Moore, worrying LGBT community
Palestinians vow to suspend talks if U.S. closes PLO mission
Zimbabweans say Mugabe must quit now, but more talks planned
FBI report on black 'extremists' raises new monitoring fears
Latest: Hariri will return to Lebanon soon amidst crisis
Palestinian official balking at US 'extortion or pressure'
Latest: Ryan Seacrest denies inappropriate behavior

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Top U.S. general says he would reject 'illegal' nuclear strike order from Trump
LaVar Ball does not credit Trump for son's release after China arrest
WWII veteran calls for help and dies as nurses laugh, video shows
Progressives call for replacing Al Franken with Keith Ellison as support for resignation builds
GOP official in NH urges Bill Clinton's name be dropped from state Democratic dinner

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Innovation's social benefits outweigh risks

men flying dronesA policy analyst who's been writing about drones considers a recent presidential memorandum a step in the right direction.