Christians, feminists fight Obama's restroom mandate

Sunday, January 15, 2017
 | 
Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com)

Keep locker rooms safe signAn unlikely pair of groups – a conservative pro-family Christian alliance and a progressive feminist organization – are joining forces to fight against President Barack Obama’s controversial bathroom mandate that ordered schools last year to permit all students identifying as “transgenders” to use whichever restroom they choose.

The Obama administration threatened to refuse federal funding to schools that do not comply with the transgender mandate – a problematic rule that many have argued puts students at risk with potential sexual predators.

A dynamic duo?

The Christian group, Focus on the Family’s newly formed public policy partner, Family Policy Alliance, is banding together with the Women’s Liberation Front to protect women and girls from being vulnerable to attack in school bathrooms and locker rooms – a crisis that is taking place at school campuses across America a result of Obama’s push to implement the LGBT’s agenda within school gates.

The unlikely match united to challenge Obama’s transgender mandate in school facilities – including locker rooms – was addressed by Family Policy Alliance Director of Policy Autumn Leva.

“How wrong does something need to be for a Christian family group and a radical feminist group to take their argument together to the Supreme Court?” Leva mused, according to Townhall, as she indicated how blatantly Obama’s push to enforce pro-LGBT policies within the schools endangers both women and girls.

The matter is regarded as so critical that Leva insists that the United States’ highest court must act – and soon – before sexual predators claim their vulnerable victims behind the closed doors of girls’ and women’s restrooms on school campuses from coast to coast.

“Privacy and safety matter, and we’re asking the high court to acknowledge that,” the pro-family activist informed.

Safety is goal one

WoLF Board of Directors Chair Kara Dansky is also well-aware of the blatantly contrasting social agendas between her organization and the Family Policy Alliance – from everything from abortion to LGBT “rights” – yet she maintains that the physical wellbeing and security of girls and women is more than reason enough to join hands with the conservative group to fight for a noble and critical cause.

She indicates that the right to engage in certain progressive behaviors should not trump females’ safety.

“On certain issues – such as gender identity, pornography and prostitution – we’ll find that the Left has pretty much sold out women on these issues,” Dansky contended. “We stand up for women and girls.”

The feminist leader argues it is not fair that men who proclaim to be girls should be able to take advantage of the same benefits as biological women enjoy under Title IX.

Densky also contends that interpreting sex as gender identity puts women and girls in harm’s way. This reasoning, she says, puts America on dangerous ground, as it places men in the same category as biological women, who are worthy of civil rights protections that they are guaranteed.

Taking Obama’s mandate to the highest court

Legal challenges to Obama’s unprecedented order – under threat of punishment and defunding – to push for LGBT “rights” at the expense of the safety of women and children have already been taken by Family Policy Alliance and WoLF as a major battle in the courts is anticipated.

Action steps in the judicial system looking to champion the arguments of Leva’s and Densky’s organizations all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States are currently moving forward.

“The two groups have submitted an amicus brief to challenge the mandate, explaining that allowing males who self-identify as women into public restrooms and locker rooms endangers women and girls,” Townhall’s Cortney O’Brien announced.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's most frustrating to you about the previous moves to defund Planned Parenthood?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Ultimate sacrifice: Teen dies shielding cousin from gunfire
  Bomb kills 13, hurts 24 in Baghdad; IS claims responsibility
  Thousands turn out to remember Kennedy on his 100th birthday
  Suspects in Kim Jong Nam murder appear in Malaysia court
  In shadow of Mosul fight, Iran establishes Nineveh foothold
McConnell juggling diverse demands on Republican health bill
Protest sparks Texas lawmaker threats of gun violence
Deputy slain in Mississippi rampage had worked in ministry

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Report: Trump to reverse Obama's Cuba policy
Pro-Sanders Dem on Russia probe: We're too preoccupied w/this, everyday Americans are getting left behind
Bodies found dumped in Philippines city besieged by ISIS-linked radical jihadists
7 actions needed to save Christians in Middle East
Kushner didn't suggest Russian communications channel in meeting, source says

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Pastor: 'Unholy alliance' puts SBC agency on thin ice

illustration of mosqueA Tennessee pastor says he was "blindsided" by a Southern Baptist agency's involvement in a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the building of mosque in New Jersey.