U.N. creating 'dangerous situation' re: Internet

Friday, December 7, 2012
 | 
Russ Jones (OneNewsNow.com)

An international summit this week in Dubai has many people worried that the United Nations is trying to gain more power over the Internet.

Billed as the 12th World Conference on International Telecommunications, the top agenda seeks to have the U.N.'s International Telecommunications Union (ITU) expand its regulating authority to the Internet.

Connelly, Michael (USJF)Michael Connelly, a constitutional attorney, U.S. Army veteran, and executive director of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), tells OneNewsNow that Russia, China, Iran, and Saudi Arabia are leading the charge in this initiative.

"They want to use that treaty as a means to take control of the Internet worldwide," he reports. "When I say 'take control,' they want to control the content on the Internet, they want the U.N. to be able to license Internet providers ... thereby control who can provide content, and they want to tax people for using the Internet."

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution this week that calls on the Obama administration to oppose U.N. control of the Internet. The Senate already passed a resolution that received bipartisan support.

"We're in a very dangerous situation here," Connelly warns. "We have a president of the United States who unfortunately has been re-elected and sees himself as the de facto dictator and wants to consolidate more power in the executive branch and to control things, and he will use the United Nations to help him do that. That's what this is all about."

While laws have been written to protect intellectual properties, no specific entities govern the Internet, which allows the global flow of information.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to a federal judge blocking Trump's order withholding funding for uncooperative 'sanctuary cities'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

IRS, postal inspectors raid Benny Hinn Ministries
Texas poised to pass 'sanctuary city' ban with jail penalty
Suspect charged with 3 counts of murder in Fresno rampage
Ark. judge pulled from death penalty cases seeks probe
ESPN laying off 100 broadcasters, writers as viewers dwindle
Health care repeal gets boost from caucus
Trump calls court's sanctuary ruling ridiculous
US Navy fires warning flare at Iran vessel in Persian Gulf

LATEST FROM THE WEB

RNC chair: GOP base will 'walk away' in midterms if border wall is not built
White House, Senate huddle on 'urgent' North Korean threat
North Korea's soldiers: A closer look the military's 'fake' capabilities
San Francisco attorney: Trump needs to 'move on' from sanctuary city policy
Coulter cancels Berkeley event

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
California 2012: Year in Review

During 2012, battles over "gay" rights, education, and the state budget crisis dominated the headlines coming out of The Golden State.