A rollback to 'race neutral' while court fights loom

Wednesday, July 11, 2018
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

high school graduationAn organization of black conservatives is praising the Trump administration for taking a race-neutral stance on college admissions.

"I believe President Trump is wise to rescind the aggressive Obama-era affirmative action directive for the use of race in ethnicity and student admissions," says longtime educator Dr. Carol Swain, who is also a spokeswoman for Project 21.

In a joint statement, the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Justice announced July 3 they were rescinding the Obama-era policy guidelines that "circumvent Congress and the courts" by creating guidance that goes beyond current federal laws, The New York Times unhappily reported.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said in a statement that the U.S. Supreme Court has determined what policies are constitutional – and its decisions are the best guide over the issue.

Swain

The story recalled that the Obama administration issued "policy guidance" in 2011 that claimed the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled there are "compelling interests" to achieve diversity in college admissions, and in elementary and secondary schools.

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a U.S. Court of Appeals decision in Fisher v. University of Texas, which found that affirmative-action measures are acceptable for the goal of diversity. Abigail Noel Fischer was denied admission to the school in 2008 and sued, claiming she was turned down because her race, white, was considered along with grades and leadership experience.

Cooper

Referring to legal fights over raced-based admissions, Project 21 spokesman Horace Cooper says the Supreme Court has never ruled that affirmative action should be a "generic remediation tool for all past racial injustice."

Swain, a former professor at Vanderbilt University, says the Obama-era guidelines resulted in "blatant discrimination" against "non-protected races," including Asians seeking admittance. 

A legal battle is under way at Harvard, in fact, where the prestigious university has admitted it excluded Asian-American student applicants to maintain those slots for other preferred races. Those excluded students have sued and legal analysts expect that case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Is President Trump going 'soft' on U.S. enemies such as Vladimir Putin?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump says 'Fake News' misreporting Putin summit
Once a Trump critic, Roby seeking redemption in Ala. runoff
Israel places new limitations on cargo crossing into Gaza
Charlottesville struggles with park names
Afghan official says IS suicide bomber kills 20

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Nunes: Mueller's Russia indictment 'ridiculous'
Putin denies having dirt on Trump, calls meddling charge 'utterly ridiculous' in Fox News interview
‘Worse than gymnastics’: Lawsuit makes explosive sex abuse allegations involving USA Diving
Terror expert compares reaction to Trump's Russia efforts to Obama's: ‘It's glaring hypocrisy’
The left-wing paradise of San Francisco

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Anti-Semitism alive and well on college campuses

anti-Israel flag BDS anti-SemiticThe anti-Israel student group, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), has stepped its rancorous rhetoric through an op-ed arguing that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would never be resolved, ‘so long as the State of Israel exists."