SCOTUS asked to review Voting Rights Act

Monday, September 24, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A black conservative organization is asking the Supreme Court to review the controversial Voting Rights Act, which it believes is outdated and unfair to a number of states.

In a recent legal brief, the Project 21 - a project of The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives - asks the Supreme Court to accept a case regarding the constitutionality of a portion of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that treats modern-day state and local government decisions as if they were made by the Dixiecrats of long ago. Specifically, the black conservative group says the Section 5 "preclearance" standard is now being enforced in Shelby County, Alabama, "as if George Wallace is still governor."

David Almasi is a spokesman for Project 21.

Almasi, David (Project 21)"The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 at a time when there was segregation, when there was open discrimination, and [when] there was hostility towards minorities voting," he notes. "Unfortunately every time the act comes up for renewal, no one wants to touch it because they're afraid the race card is going to be played against them."

In 2006, during the Bush administration, Congress reauthorized the Voting Rights Act until 2031. But Almasi says the Obama administration has taken advantage of Section 5 to prevent states like Texas and South Carolina from passing voter ID laws.

"The Justice Department will use preclearance standards as a weapon to stop voter ID to stop commonsense voter protections," he argues.

Almasi says because the Voting Rights Act has become politicized, it is up to the Supreme Court to rectify the legislative branch's "lack of leadership." The case Project 21 is asking the high court to consider is Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

At the time of its passage, the Voting Rights Act was considered an "extreme temporary measure."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's the big hold-up in 'draining the swamp'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

GOP sets Senate health care vote buoyed by McCain return
Trump asks about firing Sessions, calls his position 'weak'
Evangelical leaders rally around Kushner amid Russia probe
Immigrants wept, pleaded for water and pounded on the truck
Israel removes metal detectors from holy site entrance
In Google vs. the EU, a $2.7B fine could just be the start

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The truth about Southern black slave owners
The islamophobia industry killed Justine Damond
Sarah Huckabee Sanders called "butch queen" by Daily Beast writer and the left is silent
Post-Christian America: Gullible, intolerant, and superstitious
College official: Drop algebra requirement because minorities keep failing it

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Religious conviction cases will benefit from one success

Illinois pharmacists can adhere to their conscience and religious convictions, according to a recent court ruling.