Parental notification affirmed in Alaska

Wednesday, October 10, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

An Alaska court has upheld most of a voter-approved state law requiring at least one parent to be notified before a minor child can obtain an abortion.

Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest filed suit against the law, which gained voter approval in August 2010. The law provides an option for a judge to bypass the requirement in certain circumstances.

In its decision, the Alaska Superior Court concluded that "minors may be pleasantly surprised when underestimate parents support, comfort, and affirm them" - and that the parental notification law "sufficiently fosters a potential for worthwhile family involvement [and] that it passes constitutional muster...."

Alliance Defending Freedom acted as co-counsel in defending the law. Senior counsel Steven H. Aden tells OneNewsNow "a young girl's well-being is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line."

Aden, Steven (ADF)"Parents care more about their minor girls than an abortionist ever will," he states. "The court was right to recognize that fact, and to recognize that there is an important interest on the part of the state in insuring that parents participate with their minor girls when circumstances like pregnancy arise."

Since 1995, the people of Alaska have voted approval of parental notification with Planned Parenthood using the courts to block it. The court this time heeded direction from the Alaska Supreme Court's previous decision that the state constitution permits a legal plan through which parents are notified so they can be part of the life-changing decision.

The Superior Court upheld the entirety of the law except for two provisions: one that allowed parents to sue in civil court if an abortionist fails to obey the law, and one that required clear and convincing evidence at bypass hearings.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why are some anti-ObamaCare conservatives now tolerating their own version of it?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Pro-life advocates continue fight to defund Planned Parenthood
DeVos accuses predecessor of wasting billions of dollars
Woman strikes Capitol Police cruiser, taken into custody
No LGBTQ category included in Census proposal for 2020 count
Israel slashes dues to UN following anti-Israel votes
Palestinian woman killed after attacking Israeli police

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Liberal mayors to let illegals run wild in the streets
Obama's legacy: More horrifically unruly students
Black student groups get vast majority of $85,000 surplus at very white university
No-white-girls-in-hoops student crusaders now slamming school newspaper for covering their crusade
UMass op-ed points out stupidity of student protest topics

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
38th case filed against HHS mandate

Indiana-based Grote Industries is the latest to file suit against the ObamaCare mandate.