Despite legal setbacks, traditional marriage still upheld in California

Thursday, July 25, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-family leader in California vows to continue defending traditional marriage even after the state's highest court refused to halt homosexual "marriages" in the state. 

"We continue to make our stand on biblical principles and values, that marriage is to be between one man and one woman,” says Patricia Thompson, director of the Central California chapter of Concerned Women For America.  

The California Supreme Court decided in a 6-0 vote to reject a lawsuit by a county clerk who argued that Proposition 8 is still in effect. San Diego County clerk Ernest J. Dronenburg Jr. argued that county clerks are being forced to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples in violation of California law.

Thompson

The court, in a closed session on Wednesday, rejected Dronenburg's bid for a stay on "gay marriages."

Grassroots-driven Proposition 8, which passed in 2008, amended the California Constitution to state that California recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman.

Prop. 8 was overruled by a homosexual federal judge, and it was struck another blow in June when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law’s defenders did not have “standing” in their courtroom. California officials - notably, Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris - had refused to defend the law in court, leaving that task to proponents of Prop. 8.

Although the high court’s decision technically did not strike down Prop. 8, liberal activists claimed otherwise, while county clerks such as Dronenburg argued they were being forced to break a state law.

Prop. 8 proponents also argue the federal judge's ruling affects only the counties under the court's jurisdiction, not the entire state. Out of California's 58 counties, clerks from 24 counties have opposed Proposition 8.

The California Supreme Court will decide on whether to revive Proposition 8 in August, at the earliest.

"We had several opportunities to let our voice be heard on this issue,” says Thompson, "and the voice of the people is very, very clear."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Which entities do you feel can have the greatest impact for positive change in American culture?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump to NRA: 'You have a true friend' in White House
Congress OKs bill averting Saturday gov't shutdown
Trump names pro-life leader to high post at HHS
Tillerson eyes cutting 2,300 jobs at State Department
Judge to sentence former head of Chicago Public Schools
Coulter fans rally at Berkeley

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Washington Examiner aghast that Trump appoints pro-lifer to HHS job
Dems adopt new tactic for gun confiscation
Gun-controlled Chicago: Over 1,000 shooting victims this year
The people protesting speeches in the name of stopping fascism kind of sound like fascists
Study finds mainstream media coverage of Trump 89% negative

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Court rejects Mayor Bloomberg's soda ban, but those pockets are deep

An appeals court ruling that struck down New York City's big-soda ban is a victory for food freedom and New Yorkers, says a critic of the ban. But don't count out Mayor Bloomberg just yet, she adds.