7 million votes later, legal fight ends to defend Prop. 8 in California

Friday, August 16, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A legal group is lamenting that the last legal effort by proponents of Proposition 8 has been rejected by California's highest court.

The California Supreme Court rejected claims by Proposition 8 proponents and refused to revive the marriage law. The high court, in a closed session, rejected arguments that only an appellate court can overturn Proposition 8.

Tyler

"It really ultimately then weakens our direct democratic process that gives voters the right to enact and create law. That is a dangerous thing,” says Robert Tyler, general counsel with Advocates For Faith and Freedom.

Prop 8 proponents argued one judge's injunction of the measure only applied to the judge's jurisdiction, not statewide. Lawyers for Prop 8 say retired Judge Vaughn Walker's injunction only applied to two counties and therefore claimed California officials illegally ordered all county clerks to issue marriage licenses.

Tyler said of the ruling: "I'm afraid that basically what's going to happen now is because of what has occurred here with the U.S. Supreme Court saying that an official proponent of an initiative lacks standing to protect the law that was passed by the voters, that now whatever regime is in control in Sacramento, that if they disagree with a voters initiative, they simply won't defend it."

In a recent ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court said Proposition 8 proponents lacked legal standing to defend the initiative and left the fate of the marriage law in the hands of state officials.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How do you respond to accusations of 'hate' and 'intolerance' from the Left? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Bannon-backed PAC backs Wisconsin, Arizona Senate candidates
McCain goes on the attack against Trump...without naming him
Haley says Iran move strengthens Trump's hand on North Korea
NKorea says 'a nuclear war may break out any moment'
Somalia truck bombing toll over 300, scores remain missing

LATEST FROM THE WEB

FBI: Comey drafted letter on Clinton email investigation before completing interviews
Networks forget Obama administration championed Bergdahl as 'hero'
Some Dems still dreaming of ways Hillary could become president
Vegas security guard shot before rampage appears to have vanished
Jeffress tells Christians to call Mitch McConnell to say they're 'mad as H-E-Double L'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Even after court ruling, couple still awaits adopted daughter

Weeks after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in their favor, Matt and Melanier Capobianco of South Carolina are still awaiting legal custody of their adopted child.