Eliminating tax-free housing benefit for pastors would hurt small churches

Wednesday, November 27, 2013
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Pastors need not be concerned in the short run about a decision declaring their housing allowance unconstitutional – that's the advice from the founder of Liberty Counsel.

The decision was handed down Monday by a federal judge in Madison, Wisconsin, who wrote that the exemption "provides a benefit to religious persons and no one else, even though doing so is not necessary to alleviate a special burden on religious exercise." The Freedom From Religion Foundation filed the suit, arguing that the law unconstitutionally establishes religion.

Staver, Mat (Liberty Counsel)Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver is familiar with the judge in the case: Federal Judge Barbara Crabb.

"This particular judge in the past has been known to be someone who sides with groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation on these Establishment Clause cases," he tells OneNewsNow. "So it's not surprising that the judge came to this particular decision."

In 2010, Crabb ruled the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional, but that was overturned on appeal.

Staver, who says the exemption doesn't establish a religion, as FFRF argues, adds that the housing allowance is beneficial – particularly to small congregations.

"Many of these churches are small and they don't have the funds to pay clergy," the attorney points out. "And so consequently, one of the ways that they're able to provide housing and benefits and to actually have a minister is to have this housing allowance – and if this housing exemption is taken away, it's going to affect a lot of small congregations across the country."

Staver says there have been conversations about establishing a cap – for example, a church paying a pastor $100,000 a year or more disqualified from the deduction. He says that could set the groundwork for a discussion, but the ruling by Judge Crabb seeks to have them banned for everyone.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to a federal judge blocking Trump's order withholding funding for uncooperative 'sanctuary cities'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

IRS, postal inspectors raid Benny Hinn Ministries
Texas poised to pass 'sanctuary city' ban with jail penalty
Suspect charged with 3 counts of murder in Fresno rampage
Ark. judge pulled from death penalty cases seeks probe
ESPN laying off 100 broadcasters, writers as viewers dwindle
Health care repeal gets boost from caucus
Trump calls court's sanctuary ruling ridiculous
US Navy fires warning flare at Iran vessel in Persian Gulf

LATEST FROM THE WEB

RNC chair: GOP base will 'walk away' in midterms if border wall is not built
White House, Senate huddle on 'urgent' North Korean threat
North Korea's soldiers: A closer look the military's 'fake' capabilities
San Francisco attorney: Trump needs to 'move on' from sanctuary city policy
Coulter cancels Berkeley event

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
It's Texas vs. the EEOC re: hiring rules

The attorney general of Texas is taking the federal government to court over hiring guidelines that could negatively impact public and private employers.