CA law to protect baby killers, not innocent babies

Monday, September 5, 2016
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

CMP video #12 screen grabIn the wake of Planned Parenthood’s selling of aborted baby body parts scandal, California lawmakers could be putting the state in a position for a lengthy legal battle over a proposal that would possibly violate the state and federal constitutions.

Planned Parenthood is lobbying heavily for the bill that would assess criminal and civil penalties for anyone who reveals private videos or conversations of healthcare providers – even if it reveals criminal conduct.

Attorney Alexandra Snyder, who heads Life Legal Defense Foundation explained that the bill surfaced because of David Daleiden's work through the Center for Medical Progress, which exposed the harvesting and sale of body parts from aborted babies.

“It's narrow enough to really focus on the kind of work that he does, although it would encompass any type of really whistleblowing activity by healthcare provider, which, as a matter of public policy, we've always protected – especially in those areas that involves a risk to human life,” Snyder told OneNewsNow.

Daleiden is a citizen reporter who operated – based on the state and federal protections – for free speech and free press.

“I can't say I'm perplexed by the legislature, but I am certainly disappointed that they would not have really evaluated the consequences of this bill and considered that it is really an unconstitutional regulation,” the pro-life lawyer added.

Snyder has no doubt that if the bill is passed and signed into law, someone will file a lawsuit on constitutional grounds.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to Kamala Harris' idea for monthly cash payments that she describes as a 'tax cut'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Turkish reaction: We won’t allow 'cover-up' in Saudi killing
Thousands turn out for anti-Brexit protest in London
Trump: Saudi arrests in Khashoggi death 'a good first step'
Australia's ruling coalition forced into minority government
Caravan migrants break Guatemala border fence, rush Mexico
Trump revives fiery immigration talk for 'caravan' election
Saudis blame 'fistfight' for Jamal Khashoggi's death
Alaska's independent governor drops re-election bid

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Hillary Clinton gets asked 'painfully scripted' questions on Colbert: report
Merkel seeks full facts on Khashoggi's death
Protesters greet Pelosi with expletives during Florida campaign stop
Nancy Pelosi harassed by protesters after calling for 'collateral damage' against Republicans
Jamal Khashoggi, missing activist and writer, killed in fight, Saudi state media report

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Obergefell ruling ruled us all 'illogical'

Jim ObergefellA family court judge told a religious group it's the U.S. Supreme Court, not the states, that are behaving irrationally over the legal definition of marriage.