PJI asks high court to review CA case

Monday, January 9, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. ConstitutionA court ruling last year against pregnancy help centers in California deserves a decision from the nation's highest court, says an attorney. 

After pregnancy centers challenged a California law ordering them to shill for abortions, a 9th Circuit ruled that the requirement is a reasonable demand for the pro-life facilities. 

"The 9th Circuit did not rule favorably in terms of the religious freedom and free speech rights of these clinics," complains attorney Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute.

Dacus and PJI announced Jan. 5 that a Writ of Certiorari had been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. The writ, which means "to be more fully informed," asks the high court to review the 9th Circuit's ruling against three nonprofits that operate the clinics.

Dacus, Brad (PJI)A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit concluded that California citizens must have "access to and adequate information about constitutionally protected medical services like abortion," the Los Angeles Times reported last year.

There are approximately 200 pregnancy centers in California now required by law to inform women about government programs that include abortion, the story stated.

The court ruling states the clinics are required to "render only the existence of publicly-funded family-planning services," claiming in the same ruling that a pro-life clinic disseminating such information about abortion is not suggesting or encouraging women to use those services.

"They have a right to free speech but only if they say what the state wants them to say," Dacus says of the law, which took effect in January, 2016.

He tells OneNewsNow that there is hope for a Supreme Court decision, citing a "conflict of case law" in other states where similar laws have been created but struck down by other courts. 

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Which is the stronger argument for a pro-life view?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Prayer on trial again in North Carolina
GOP leaders boost pressure as health bill crunch time nears
  Death toll climbs to 4 in London terrorist attack
US tells allies to do more to pressure ISIS terrorists
Supreme Court pick vows adherence to legal precedence
Sears has "substantial doubt" about its future

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Student assaults visiting basketball team over braided hair
Parent activists outraged as West Virginia Republicans amend their own bill to replace Common Core
School lesson compares Trump to Hitler, Mussolini
Bring Assata back ASAP
Wayne LaPierre issues a call to battle to 5 million NRA members

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Officials dismiss parental rights in favor of sex change

judge banging gavelA Minnesota mother is waiting to see if a federal judge will respect her constitutional right to act like a responsible parent.