PJI asks high court to review CA case

Monday, January 9, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. ConstitutionA court ruling last year against pregnancy help centers in California deserves a decision from the nation's highest court, says an attorney. 

After pregnancy centers challenged a California law ordering them to shill for abortions, a 9th Circuit ruled that the requirement is a reasonable demand for the pro-life facilities. 

"The 9th Circuit did not rule favorably in terms of the religious freedom and free speech rights of these clinics," complains attorney Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute.

Dacus and PJI announced Jan. 5 that a Writ of Certiorari had been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. The writ, which means "to be more fully informed," asks the high court to review the 9th Circuit's ruling against three nonprofits that operate the clinics.

Dacus, Brad (PJI)A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit concluded that California citizens must have "access to and adequate information about constitutionally protected medical services like abortion," the Los Angeles Times reported last year.

There are approximately 200 pregnancy centers in California now required by law to inform women about government programs that include abortion, the story stated.

The court ruling states the clinics are required to "render only the existence of publicly-funded family-planning services," claiming in the same ruling that a pro-life clinic disseminating such information about abortion is not suggesting or encouraging women to use those services.

"They have a right to free speech but only if they say what the state wants them to say," Dacus says of the law, which took effect in January, 2016.

He tells OneNewsNow that there is hope for a Supreme Court decision, citing a "conflict of case law" in other states where similar laws have been created but struck down by other courts. 

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Who do you believe when you hear them talk about the Republican tax reform bill?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump: I'm not considering firing special counsel Mueller
Putin thanks Trump for CIA tip on terrorist bombings
McCain returning home to Ariz., will likely miss tax vote
Flames threaten SoCal coastal communities as firefighters mour
GOP betting that its fix for U.S. economy will defy warnings
Thousands disappear as China polices thought
Suicide bombers attack church in Pakistan, killing 8

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Power outage at Atlanta airport causes 'pandemonium,' grounds flights
Canadian PM Justin Trudeau gives Trump high marks, despite strained NAFTA talks
Is God going to do away with Christmas trees?
Report: NBC paid off producer who accused Chris Matthews of sexual harassment
Sen. Schumer: Bomb-detection units needed at transit hubs

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Officials dismiss parental rights in favor of sex change

judge banging gavelA Minnesota mother is waiting to see if a federal judge will respect her constitutional right to act like a responsible parent.