Peeking inside a left-wing playbook

Friday, February 10, 2017
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

Gorsuch nominated by TrumpA political battle is coming over Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch – but the question is how far will the Democrats push the fight. 

"The Supreme Court nominee's got a solid record," observes Gary Bauer of the Campaign for Working Families. "There's going to be a brutal battle to get him on the Supreme Court." 

Democrats will challenge the legitimacy of Gorsuch, predicts Curt Levey, of The Committee for Justice, but he doubts the Democrats will filibuster the nomination.

"Because if they did, there'd be a permanent end to the filibuster for the Supreme Court," says Levey. "And then the Democrats would have no leverage when they really need it, which is when they're replacing a Kennedy or a Ginsburg."  

Levey shared his nomination predictions in an op-ed for The Hill, the D.C.-based media website. He predicts that Democrats will use the confirmation hearings to attack Trump. Republicans should give room to their Democratic colleagues, he suggests, who are suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and will attack the president more than the nominee.

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagLevey also predicts that Democrats will employ a "favorite page" from their playbook, which is attacking a white male as a danger to women and minorities.

"Never mind that an examination of Neil Gorsuch's record reveals no such dangers," Levey writes.

Speaking to OneNewsNow about the filibuster, Levey says Democrats should keep the filibuster option around for another reason. "It moderates the pick," he explains.

Trump picked Gorsuch knowing the Democrats can filibuster, and he will also pick a second replacement on the court with the same understanding.

"But the moment that option goes away," Levey  reasons, "President Trump is free to pick anyone he wants." 

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you describe Obama's last-minute rule preventing abortion-providers from being denied federal funding?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Could 'Nexit' follow Brexit after Dutch elections?
Iraqi forces advance on Islamic State-held western Mosul
Malaysia looks for 4 North Korean suspects who left country
US vice president visits former Nazi concentration camp
Last-2nd launch delay for SpaceX at historic moon pad
Silver: NBA will keep eye on state's inclusion policies
Arpaio successor pulls back on immigration holds in jails
DC Council chair: Council to revisit paid family leave bill

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Priebus: NY Times 'fake news'
Christian's Muslim attackers 'tormented by visions of blood'
McCain defends the media in NBC interview
Leftists, Establishment conservatives freak out over MILO CPAC speech
Bolton emerging as frontrunner to replace Flynn

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
O’Reilly: Wash. florist SSM case could go to SCOTUS

U.S. Supreme CourtIn the wake of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling against a Christian florist who would not to serve a same-sex “wedding” because such unions go against her deeply held religious beliefs, a debate is continuing to brew between conservative Christian leaders and top Democrats on the controversial matter – a matter that could very likely go all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), according to a statement posted by The O’Reilly Factor.