Suit challenges law forcing pro-abortion speech

Friday, February 17, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

crisis pregnancy centerAn Illinois law telling pro-life pregnancy centers what to say and how to say it is part of the pro-abortion battle to subtract conscience rights from the agenda.

Illinois passed a law that requires the staff of pro-life centers to tell their clients that abortion is an alternative to saving their babies. In addition, the law stipulates that the staff must provide information about the abortion-provider with the cheapest price.

Conversely, abortion clinics are not required to refer abortion-minded women to pro-life centers to keep their babies or to consider adoption.

Practically speaking, the requirements force the pregnancy centers to act in a manner that is contrary to the pro-life mission and, in essence, to act as a referral. As a result, Thomas More Society attorney Thomas Olp has filed suit on behalf of 18 pro-life centers.

Illinois"It's unconstitutional," says Olp. "It's compelled speech, and it's viewpoint discrimination. It's a violation of the Equal Protection Clause."

The attorney contends that the law is another step the Left is taking to convince people that abortion isn't a moral decision.

"Anybody with a conscience realizes that abortion is inherently a moral issue," Olp tells OneNewsNow, "and it's an immoral act, and that'll never go away. So it's just another failed ploy by the pro-abortion industry to take what is morally unacceptable [and make it] acceptable…”

Thomas More Society is convinced that it will prevail. Similar ordinances in Baltimore, Maryland, and Austin, Texas, were overturned in the court system. One passed last year in California but has been challenged in court.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you describe Obama's last-minute rule preventing abortion-providers from being denied federal funding?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Could 'Nexit' follow Brexit after Dutch elections?
Iraqi forces advance on Islamic State-held western Mosul
Malaysia looks for 4 North Korean suspects who left country
US vice president visits former Nazi concentration camp
Last-2nd launch delay for SpaceX at historic moon pad
Silver: NBA will keep eye on state's inclusion policies
Arpaio successor pulls back on immigration holds in jails
DC Council chair: Council to revisit paid family leave bill

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Priebus: NY Times 'fake news'
Christian's Muslim attackers 'tormented by visions of blood'
McCain defends the media in NBC interview
Leftists, Establishment conservatives freak out over MILO CPAC speech
Bolton emerging as frontrunner to replace Flynn

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
O’Reilly: Wash. florist SSM case could go to SCOTUS

U.S. Supreme CourtIn the wake of the Washington State Supreme Court ruling against a Christian florist who would not to serve a same-sex “wedding” because such unions go against her deeply held religious beliefs, a debate is continuing to brew between conservative Christian leaders and top Democrats on the controversial matter – a matter that could very likely go all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), according to a statement posted by The O’Reilly Factor.