Attorney: 'Asset forfeiture' law oversteps justice

Friday, March 17, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

police lights flashingThe Rutherford Institute is fighting against "asset forfeiture," a type of law that allows government officials to confiscate personal property.

In the case of James Leonard in April 2013, Leonard and his girlfriend were driving along a Texas highway reputed to be a "drug corridor." Officers stopped his car, searched it, and found no evidence of a crime, but they found a safe in the trunk containing $201,000 in cash.

"The mother of the fellow was contacted and she said the money was from the sale of her home and he was bringing the money to her so she could buy the son a home," John Whitehead, founder of The Rutherford Institute, explains. "There was even a bill of sale for the home in the safe."

Regardless, police confiscated the mother's money and kept it, even though no crime was committed. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal, thereby allowing the police to keep the cash.

In his written opinion denouncing the profit incentives that drive such schemes, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas cites several other similar incidents – citations that validate Whitehead's argument that Leonard's case isn't an isolated incident.

Whitehead, John (Rutherford Institute)"People are actually losing their homes, and then all the police have to do now is to accuse you of a crime, and they confiscate what you own," Whitehead says. "You have to go to the court to get it back."

The attorney says many people don't have the funds to fight a court battle.

"I would say to most people, be very careful what you're carrying in your cars," he adds. "If you're carrying any kind of cash, it can be confiscated. You don't have to be doing anything wrong, and unfortunately we're having to fight to reverse these laws and get rid of them."

There's no move in Congress to change the laws, so the fight will have to be in the courts and state legislatures.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

The conclusion you draw from California's left-wing leadership is…(choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump signs order sweeping away Obama-era climate policies
Nunes won't leave Russia probe; Ryan says no need to
  Public television chief says Trump budget would hit options
  Campus 'free speech zones' face new round of scrutiny
City leaders defy WH threat on 'sanctuary' policies
ICE: Rape suspect's father arrested after immigration review

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Christian student suspended after challenging Muslim prof’s claim that Jesus wasn’t crucified
Are facts now considered 'white supremacism'?
Racism: Its true cause and sure solution
College diversity council posts fake racist flyers to encourage ‘dialogue’
Let the leggings be banned! (Burqas, too)

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
'No proof' in lesbian's lawsuit, says Staver

Lady of JusticeAfter several people have been sentenced for helping her ex-partner flee to South America, a lesbian has filed a civil case against a Christian university and an attorney.