SCOTUS could chip power away from unions

Monday, June 12, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

manufacturing unionsA legal group is confident the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case involving union dues.

Attorneys for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Liberty Justice Center have asked the Supreme Court to take up a case known as Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

"The Janus case is a very important step in our efforts to end the forced payment of fees to a union as a condition of employment," says Mark Mix of National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation. "The Janus case specifically deals with government employees. Interestingly enough, if we win at the Supreme Court, which we fully intend to do, it would protect every government employee in America from being fired for failure to tender dues or fees to a labor union."

In 1977, the Supreme Court established that union officials could have workers fired if they didn't pay dues or fees to a union. Since that time, Mix and other attorneys have been trying to find a case to get back to the Supreme Court. They argue that unions representing government employees violate the free-speech rights of workers by collecting money from people who don't want to join.

Mix

"The case, Janus v. AFSCME, has the potential to overturn a 40-year-old Supreme Court precedent and free every government worker in America from forced-dues unionism," Mix continues. "Janus is following in the footsteps of last year's high-profile Supreme Court case, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association."

Like Friedrichs, Janus argues that being forced to pay dues to a union violates the First Amendment rights of government employees. Oral arguments were held just before Justice Antonin Scalia died.

"While Friedrichs deadlocked 4-4 after Justice Scalia's death, the confirmation of Justice [Neil] Gorsuch offers a new opportunity for the Supreme Court to rule public-sector forced dues unconstitutional," says Mix. "In fact, because the high court split 4-4 in Friedrichs, Gorsuch is likely to be the decisive vote on this issue."

Even Associated Press reports that the "Supreme Court seemed all but certain to rule against the unions" in the Friedrichs case.

Regardless, a federal appeals court in Chicago rejected Janus' claim in March, ruling that the fees were constitutional under the 1977 case, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education.

AFSCME president Lee Saunders called the case an effort to chip away at the power of unions "to negotiate a fair return on our work, provide for our families, and lift up the concerns of all working families."

"Saunders would obviously say that because he's got a pretty sweet deal," responds Mix. "The business model for AFSCME and the union officials that run it is, they can compel people to pay them as a condition of keeping their jobs."

The Supreme Court will not take up Janus v. AFSCME until September, at the earliest.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's the better result from the GOP run-off election in Alabama between Roy Moore and Luther Strange?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Latest: About 24 NFL players kneel for anthem in London
  Sen. Collins likely against GOP health bill in latest blow
  Aid begins to flow to hurricane-hit Puerto Rico
  Merkel bids for 4th term as Germans head to polls
  Weiner faces sentencing in latest chapter of sexting drama
Trump comments on Curry, NFL protests anger athletes
U.S. flies mission north of DMZ, sends message to NKorea
Iraq seeks other nations' help to build a nuclear reactor

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump cranks up NKorea threats: 'They won't be around much longer'
Ravens, Jaguars players kneel during national anthem after Trump's attacks on NFL
Part II: Why the NFL is a product I refuse to purchase any longer
A rookie becomes first to 'take a knee' during an MLB national anthem
NKorea says strike on U.S. is 'inevitable' as Pentagon flies bombers off coast

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Rainbow flag OK, but national motto crosses the line

Houston police cruiser with rainbow decalsGovernment agencies, including police departments, have raised a question during "gay pride" month that a constitutional attorney suggests ought to be answered.