Supreme Court plaza policy challenged, again

Monday, June 19, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme CourtFree speech is constitutionally protected – but not at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Rutherford Institute has previously filed lawsuits on behalf of people who want to quietly demonstrate at the nation's highest court. Their latest filing was on behalf of two Christians who are against war and wanted to hold signs reflecting that view while on the huge Supreme Court plaza.

Institute founder John Whitehead tells OneNewsNow the lawsuit (Payden-Travers v. Talkin) was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but he adds that a federal judge dismissed the case.

"The Supreme Court had, in the past, basically passed a law saying that people can't be out there, backing up a 60-year-old law, which says – believe it or not – that it's unlawful to display any flag, banner, or device that portrays a message," Whitehead explains. "This means Girl Scouts wanting to sell cookies on the front of that large plaza could be run off."

According to Whitehead, the original purpose of the rule was to make sure justices aren't influenced by demonstrations, but he questions if any such influence could really happen now.

Whitehead, John (Rutherford Institute)"If you think about it," the attorney suggests, "the Supreme Court justices arrive in limousines through an underground entrance with guards around them. I doubt they ever even take a look out there [to the plaza]. They can on the surveillance cameras, but I don't think two peace activists are in any way going to sway a Supreme Court decision."

Finally, Whitehead says that according to federal law, "the government must have a compelling interest in order to violate free speech and the religious guarantees of the Constitution."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why do you suspect LGBT activists mocked 'slippery slope' warning about marriage? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Military heads want transgender enlistment hold
5 GOP senators now oppose health bill ... enough to sink it
40 people killed in bomb, gun attacks in 3 Pakistani cities
London council evacuates residents amid fire safety concerns
Utah evacuees watched flames draw closer, smoke get thicker
Senate panel seeks details on Lynch role in Clinton probe
Trump signs law to make VA more accountable for vets' care
Military leaders seek delay in transgender enlistment

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Washington Post confirms: Trump right on Russian election tampering
Caught on tape: Dem official says he's 'glad' Scalise got shot
Dem congressman: Let's face it, in some parts of the country– Pelosi is more toxic Trump
Senate Obamacare repeal draft includes Planned Parenthood defunding, pro-life language
Ferguson's Michael Brown to get Hollywood treatment

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
No room in Sweden for a pro-life midwife

baby feetA Swedish midwife vows to continue her battle for the right to refuse to participate in abortion.