Can gov't force 'free advertising' for abortuaries?

Tuesday, January 9, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

judge banging gavelA Supreme Court decision this year will have an impact on the First Amendment and pro-life pregnancy centers nationwide.

Attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed their opening brief Monday with the U.S. Supreme Court in a lawsuit challenging a California law that requires that pro-life pregnancy centers provide free advertising for the abortion industry.

ADF represents a pro-life pregnancy care center network – National Institute of Family and Life Advocates – and two independent centers in the case that the Supreme Court agreed to take up last November.

Harle

"We know for sure this will be argued this spring and we will have a decision by the end of June from the Supreme Court, which is very exciting and great news for all Americans," says ADF attorney Denise Harle. "The government shouldn't have the power to force anyone to speak a message that they disagree with and to punish them if they don't – and that's exactly what this California law does."

The case, she says, will not have an impact on Roe v. Wade.

"[This case is] really about the First Amendment and free speech," explains Harle. "The question here doesn't have to do with the legality of abortion; it's just whether the government can compel private citizens to speak a particular message against their will."

The office of the California attorney general did not respond to OneNewsNow's request for comment. However, Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D-California) told the LA Times last November the law "ensures that women in California receive accurate information about their healthcare options."

"We also know the information about abortion is just about everywhere," counters Harle. "The law does not require other healthcare providers to provide information about abortion or pregnancy resource centers, so it really does not make sense because we all know that everyone is aware of abortion and we don't have to commandeer pro-life speakers to get the message out that abortion exists."

The case is National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to the announcement that compulsively playing video games now qualifies as a mental health condition?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump digs in on immigration amid family separation crisis
Strong quake near Osaka, Japan, kills 4, knocks over walls
Justices: No definitive ruling on partisan districts
Merkel, allies avert collision for now in German migrant row
Compulsive video-game playing could be mental health problem

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Suspect dead, 20 injured in shooting at a New Jersey festival
Anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok willing to testify before Congress — and leave no stone unturned
Democrats gain entry to NJ immigration detention center after arguing with cops, 'literally banging on the door'
Trump's co-author predicted president would resign last year
One dead, 22 hurt in NJ arts festival shooting

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
TX cheerleaders case drags on after school appeals

gavel with U.S. flagA legal battle over cheerleaders and their Bible verse banners continues in the courts but one attorney stresses it's about more than just paper and paint.