NJ high court OK's discrimination against churches

Monday, April 23, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

cross on church steepleA controversial decision issued by the New Jersey Supreme Court maintains that churches in the Garden State should be prohibited from receiving historic preservation grants.

In the case, Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) v. Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that $4.6 million given to 12 churches violates the Religious Aid Clause of the state’s constitution.

Diana Verm, who serves as a counsel at Becket – a legal organization based in Washington, D.C. – argues that religious liberty is for all, and her group filed a brief in support of the churches.

"The court's decision leaves churches out in the cold and denies the many important contributions they have made to our nation's history and culture," Verm maintains. "Denying widely available historical preservation grants to churches simply because they are churches departs from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling last summer in Trinity Lutheran that the Constitution prohibits governments from discriminating against religious organizations."

While the New Jersey Supreme Court contends that its ruling does not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution, Verm contends that the U.S. Supreme Court could see things quite differently – if the case is appealed to the nation's high court.

"The U.S. Supreme Court does have the ability to overturn a state supreme court decision or a state supreme court constitutional provision if it violates the United States Constitution, and that is what the Supreme Court could possibly do in this case, [which] is [to] say, 'Your interpretation of this New Jersey provision violates the United States Constitution in this case – the Free Exercise Clause – because it discriminates against religious groups,'" Verm pointed out.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Bottom line: What's the REAL reason Democrats' are so adamant about blocking Kavanaugh's confirmation?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  As Senate hearing set for Kavanaugh, new accuser emerges
  At UN, unrepentant Trump set to rattle foes, friends alike
  Actor James Woods bashes Twitter after getting locked out
  Florence the week after: Thousands brace for more flooding
Tenn. Democrat aims for Senate win by edging away from party
Iran's president blames US after attack on military parade
Pope warns Lithuanians to guard against anti-Semitism

LATEST FROM THE WEB

College classmate says Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at Yale party
Why is anyone taking Ford's accusation seriously?
Experts: Growing global and household debt leading to economic downturn worse than 10 years ago
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford
Tentative deal reached for Kavanaugh accuser to testify, then party 'witness' drops major statement

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
At issue: Parsonage allowance – taxable or not?

cross on church steepleShould the government continue to offer a housing allowance for clergy? That's a decision coming up on federal appeal.