Rutherford asks high court to hear licensing appeal

Friday, May 25, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagShould government require you to train for and obtain a license for everything, including braiding hair? 

The Rutherford Institute is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down a Missouri law requiring individuals to secure a license in order to braid hair.

Rutherford attorney John Whitehead, who founded the civil liberties law firm, says two black hair-braiders from St. Louis are challenging a law that claims they are engaged in cosmetology.

"It's a natural hair care technique. It involves intricate braiding and locking," Whitehead explains. "But they don't use any chemicals or heat, or any other process, that would be dangerous to persons."

 A cosmetology license, meanwhile, requires 1,500 hours of classroom work and testing at an approximate cost of $12,000.

Whitehead, John (Rutherford Institute)"This is something they already know how to do," he says, "and they are challenging this because they say this is crazy."

But lower courts have rejected their claims, leading Rutherford to appeal to the Supreme Court.

"We're saying that there are certain fundamental rights here that are protected under the Constitution," Whitehead argues, "and irrational occupational licensing requirements, in my opinion, are ways the government just overtaxes you again."

The appeal to the high court comes at the same time that reforming occupational licensing has become a hot-button topic of late, particularly among millennials and advocates for less government who make the same arguments as Whitehead.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is most revealing so far in Dr. Ford's allegations against against Judge Kavanaugh?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Kavanaugh's accuser makes more demands for testimony agreement
  5 people, 3 of them infants, stabbed at NYC day care center
Florence-weary South Carolina could get more record flooding
China distances children from families to subdue Muslim west
It's high times for soaring marijuana stocks on Wall Street

LATEST FROM THE WEB

White existence is a crime, says BLF spokesperson
College kids don’t know where to buy postage stamps
The Kavanaugh farce descends into tragedy
Portland State considers disarming police after disputed officer-involved shooting
Revenge of the celebrity PSAs: The Kavanaugh edition (Now do Keith Ellison)

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Christian baker to be baked or vindicated by SCOTUS?

Jack Phillips making cakeThe United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will soon issue its ruling on the Masterpiece Cakeshop lawsuit, and justices will decide a very fundamental question.