Judge: DOJ must give money to law-breaking city

Thursday, June 7, 2018
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel with U.S. flagIt was frustrating to watch a federal judge rule in favor of Philadelphia's sanctuary city policy instead of the rule of law, says a conservative activist.

U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson has ruled in favor of the City of Philadelphia after it sued the federal government for withholding grant funds in response to the city's harboring of illegal aliens.

Like other Democrat-led cities, Philadelphia has announced it is a "sanctuary city" that will defy federal immigration laws, thus setting up another city creating a legal stand-off with the U.S. Justice Department.

Diane Gramley, president of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, says the DOJ was threatening to withhold $1.5 million in grant funds to a city that changed its cooperation to demand a warrant.

Gramley, Diane (AFA of Pennsylvania)The current federal requirements give ICE agents access to jails to interview suspected illegal aliens and require local authorities to give ICE advance notice if those inmates are set to be released according to The Associated Press

"The judge wrote that it violates statutory and constitutional law," Gramley says. "I'm not sure which constitution he's reading but I believe it's written in the U.S. Constitution that part of the President's job is to defend the country."

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has vocally warned cities and counties they will be punished if they that side with illegal aliens over federal immigration agents and current federal laws. Rulings such as Baylson's, however, are helping those cities defy the DOJ and yet receive federal dollars. 

In some states such as California, where a controversial state law literally prohibits cooperation, some local jurisdictions are vowing to ignore a state law that is itself ignoring federal immigration law. California state officials, ironically, have vowed to punish those cities that are cooperating with Sessions and the DOJ. 

Gramley suggests the issue needs to go to before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"It's troubling to think it has to go there," she says, "when to most Americans it's written in plain English that the President has the right to protect our borders."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your response to leftists who are calling for ICE to be abolished?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort guilty of 8 charges
Cohen pleads guilty, implicates Trump in hush-money scheme
Authorities: Iowa student killed by Mexican in US illegally
Tibbetts' death suspect has immigration detainer
Strong quake rocks Venezuela; buildings evacuated in capital
Father-in-law glares at Colorado man accused of killing 3

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Breaking: Here’s what President Trump said about the Manafort conviction
Jury convicts Manafort of tax fraud
Mollie Tibbetts murder suspect ID'd as Cristhian Rivera, 24, living in US illegally
Progressives don't want blacks thinking
‘White Rage,’ Black Lives Matter: How one professor teaches U.S. history

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
SCOTUS confirms the right to pray

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagJune brought plenty of big surprises from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), with a major one being the reversal of a case involving prayer.