'NYT' hypocritically justifies hiring racist editor

Friday, August 3, 2018
 | 
Steve Jordahl (OneNewsNow.com)

New York Times logo (NYT)The New York Times is standing behind its hiring of an editor who has had a number of very controversial tweets in the not-so-distant past.

For a journalist who began her career as an attorney, Sarah Jeong appears to be extremely careless with her words.

The new New York Times tech editor has a fairly recent online past that is causing much commotion and some public outrage.

As recently as 2015, Jeong tweeted a number of virulently racist remarks, most of which – even without their racist content – are not fit for family audiences.

The controversial editor’s favorite target was white men, who – to paraphrase – are miserable, groveling goblins who should be extinct.

To add insult to injury, the Times knew about the tweets before it hired her.

Curtis Houck of Media Research Center contends that the Times is not fessing up to its problematic decision to let Jeong join its editorial team.

“The New York Times is perfectly standing by her – as if they knew about this beforehand,” Houck pointed out. “They say that she was attacked first … or something else. There's just all these excuses.”

In a press release, the Times justified hiring Jeong.

"The fact that she is a young Asian woman has made her a subject of frequent online harassment,” New York’s biggest daily claimed in the release. “For a period of time, she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers."

To Houck this excuse resembles a strange cross between Stockholm Syndrome and some sick cultural appropriation, and – more to the point – a hypocritical stance.

“This is not the pattern that they take with other people – that they have taken in the past – and that's where the issue is … and why people are upset,” he stressed.

Earlier this year in February, the very same New York Times fired an essayist named Quinn Norton – whom it had hired earlier that same day – after discovering a series of tweets in which it claims that she used slurs aimed at homosexuals.

Houck argues that the only difference between the two is that Norton offended homosexuals, while Jeong only insulted white people.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Predict the most-heard phrase when Dems push for more gun restrictions in 2019: (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

US senator apologizes to anyone offended by 'hanging' remark
El Chapo trial witness: Ex-Mexico security chief was bribed
Mistrial declared in case of slain NYC runner Karina Vetrano
Lawyer: Trump provides written answers to Mueller questions
Obama judge bars US from enforcing Trump asylum ban
Trump says no new punishment for writer's murder

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Utah election called between Mia Love and Ben McAdams – and it's bad news for Pelosi
Big victory for Christian baker in Colorado
Robert De Niro and his wife, Grace Hightower, split after 2 decades: reports
Dog attack at Oklahoma school leaves 12 children injured
Joni Eareckson Tada diagnosed with cancer again

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
MRC: CNN's Lanny Davis fiasco its typical M.O.

CNN image (Lanny Davis on Cohen)The mainstream media found it too good to pass up when news broke that Donald Trump knew about the infamous "Trump Tower meeting" before it happened. The only problem – it was wrong.