Analysis: Abstainers envision themselves as 'middle men'

Monday, December 3, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A scholar and expert on European policy feels it's unfortunate that countries like Great Britain and Germany opted to abstain from voting on the Palestinian state resolution last week at the United Nations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his cabinet will travel to Germany this week -- after Germany joined Britain and several other Western nations in abstaining on a U.N. vote to recognize a Palestinian state. Israel, the United States, Canada and a handful of other countries voted against the resolution; more than 130 voted in favor.

Germany is traditionally one of Israel's staunchest allies in Europe. It abstained because it feared the Palestinians' move could further harden positions in the stalled Middle East peace process, but stopped short of voting "no" to their call for recognition.

Schaefer

Brett Schaefer is a fellow at the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage Foundation. He says countries like Germany and Britain do not want to choose sides.

"The Europeans see themselves as sort of 'middle men' in trying to negotiate this process," he explains. "The Europeans envision themselves as trying to be honest brokers or negotiators in trying to mediate the peace. Unfortunately, I think they're misreading the situation."

Schaefer believes the vote last week will only encourage the Palestinians to take more rash actions.

"[They will] try and isolate Israel in terms of perhaps inviting the International Criminal Court to extend its jurisdiction there," he predicts. "And perhaps they would also be emboldened to encourage more terrorist acts such as those we saw occurring in the rocket strikes out of Gaza earlier this month."

Schaefer thinks it is very unfortunate that the vote took place.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What would convince you that President Trump is as "pro-life" as Obama was "pro-abortion"?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Senate confirms Trump's pick to run the CIA
At least 4 reported dead in California storms
California confirms Trump opponent as attorney general
UN: Boko Haram's toll includes 515,000 malnourished kids
US fights Microsoft's bid to tell users when feds take data
Trump signs executive orders on trade and abortion
'Net neutrality' foe Ajit Pai is new FCC head
Rubio to back Tillerson for secretary of state

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Blizzard of ‘snowflakes’ prove political correctness is killing colleges
John Banzhaf: Felony rioting charges could provide genuine ‘deterrent effect’ on future anarchists
America's second civil war
Spicer changes up format at WH briefings, moves to hit reset with press
Tom Cotton's fiery exchange with Schumer over stalled nominations

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
U.S. defense act includes Iron Dome

A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee is pleased that the Senate has agreed to support a vital and proven Israeli anti-missile defense system in the Defense Authorization bill.