Eyes on North Korea

Monday, March 20, 2017
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

North Korean missile launchA national defense analyst applauds Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for acknowledging that military action may be the only solution to the North Korean nuclear threat.

On Friday, Tillerson visited with North Korea on a military base near the Demilitarized Zone. Then during a news conference in Seoul, the secretary of state declared an end of the U.S. policy of "strategic patience" toward the East Asian country.

"Certainly we don't want for things to get to a military conflict," he stated. "We're quite clear on that in our communications. But obviously, if North Korea takes actions against South Korean forces or our own forces, then that will be met with an appropriate response."


Robert Maginnis, senior fellow for national security at the Family Research Council, has been saying for years that the U.S. must seriously consider taking military action to stop North Korea's march to nuclear weapons status.

"Obviously, sanctions up to now have failed to work," he observes. "The Chinese have failed to press the case that we have because, after all, they are a proxy of the Chinese Communist government. We have sat on the sidelines to a large degree since the years of the Clinton administration, watching this rogue regime develop a fairly robust ballistic missile capability."

On that note, former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee told the Fox News Channel on Friday that China needs to take more responsibility for getting the North Korean regime under control. 

"Tillerson and the president are playing it exactly right. They're recognizing that we're not really going to have much influence over North Korea because they're led by a freaking lunatic," Huckabee said. "But the only entity that has any opportunity to put a lid on him will be China – because they need China; they depend on China. And China is the big brother who can put him in a half-Nelson and explain how it's going to be done. And I think that's exactly the right kind of pressure: put it on the third party, China, and make it clear [to China] 'If you don't get North Korea under control, you don't want the rest of us going in there and doing it, because it's not going to be pretty. So you better get your little brother under control.'" 

According to Maginnis, the North Koreans are working to miniaturize nuclear weapons to put on those missiles capable of threatening the American mainland.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




Do you feel sorry for left-wingers who are blind to Islam and its murderous ideology?





UK bomber's links to larger network probed, dad, brother detained
Suspected suicide bombs in Jakarta kills 3 policemen
Latest: 2 blacks on Cosby case of 12; alternates picked
Setting aside past rude talk, Trump and pope focus on peace
Wildfire forces evacuations at Washington state tourism spot
CBO gives House health bill mixed review
UK investigates 'network' of alleged Manchester attackers
'We can use peace': Trump and Pope Francis meet


Fox News Poll: Trump approval down, voters support special counsel on Russia
Montana GOP candidate body slams reporter on eve of special election
'I Am Israel' – a thrilling film reveals a nation reborn
Trump, Pope Francis meet, vow to fight for 'life, freedom of worship'
Citing disparities, Dem wants to sink $100B into dilapidated public schools


Cartoon of the Day


Obama-Clinton uranium scandal w/Russia exposed?

Hillary and Putin RussiaWhile then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton decided whether to allow the sale of a company holding 20 percent of America’s uranium capacity to the Russian government, tens of millions of uranium investor dollars were received by the Clinton Foundation – not to mention a $500,000 speaking fee received by Bill Clinton from a Kremlin-affiliated bank.