Shame on the U.N.

Friday, November 30, 2012
Dr. Michael L. Brown - Guest Columnist

Michael BrownNovember 29 used to be a day of celebration in the history of the United Nations - until that date rolled around this year and the U.N. chose to rebuke Israel.

On November 29, 1947, the United Nations' General Assembly voted to partition Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. The Jewish leadership accepted the plan; the Arab leadership rejected it. Sixty-five years later, on November 29, 2012, Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, excoriated Israel, praised Islamic terrorists, and received the overwhelming approbation of the General Assembly, which voted 138 to 9 (with 41 abstentions) to recognize Palestine as a "non-member observer state."

Abbas was perfectly clear: "The moment has arrived for the world to say clearly: Enough of aggression, settlements and occupation." The world, then, through the U.N., would be rebuking Israel with its vote.

To be sure, President Abbas made some conciliatory remarks, such as: "We did not come here seeking to delegitimize a state established years ago, and that is Israel." But these remarks were completely overridden by his unstinting condemnation of Israel, whose policies, he claimed, "have thrown [negotiations] into the intensive care unit."

How could he claim that he came to the U.N. to "launch a final serious attempt to achieve peace"?

Speaking of the recent conflict in Gaza, Abbas said, "Palestine comes today to the United Nations General Assembly at a time when it is still tending to its wounds and still burying its beloved martyrs of children, women and men who have fallen victim to the latest Israeli aggression, still searching for remnants of life amid the ruins of homes destroyed by Israeli bombs on the Gaza Strip, wiping out entire families, their men, women and children murdered along with their dreams, their hopes, their future and their longing to live an ordinary life and to live in freedom and peace."

Yes, this is how Abbas attempts "to breathe new life into the negotiations" with Israel: by failing to mention the thousands of rockets launched first by Hamas terrorists at Israel; by failing to acknowledge that some of these Palestinian "martyrs" were men like Ahmed Jabari, the mastermind of numerous mass-murder plots against unarmed Israeli citizens; by forgetting entirely that it was Hamas that brutally drove the Palestinian Authority out of Gaza.

Yet in the mind of Abbas (and apparently of the U.N. General Assembly as well), it is the Israelis who are the murderers, guilty of "brute force and war." And how many times did Abbas speak of "Israeli aggression" in this speech, which was allegedly aimed at achieving peace?

Abbas also recounted the revisionist version of recent Palestinian history, noting that, "hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were torn from their homes and displaced within and outside of their homeland, thrown from their beautiful, embracing, prosperous country to refugee camps in one of the most dreadful campaigns of ethnic cleansing and dispossession in modern history." (What extraordinary charges!)

The tragic irony of all this is that, had the Arab leadership accepted the U.N. partition plan offered in 1947, "Palestine would be celebrating its [65th] anniversary this May. And there would have been no Nakba [catastrophe]" (quoting Professor Ephraim Karsh in his important book Palestine Betrayed).

As far back as 1937, David Ben Gurion stated that, "We do not wish and do not need to expel Arabs and take their place. All our aspiration is built on the assumption - proven throughout all our activity in the Land of Israel - that there is enough room in the country for ourselves and the Arabs."

And on November 29, 1947, when the Jewish leadership accepted the two-state partition plan, Golda Meir said: "We are happy and ready for what lies ahead. Our hands are extended in peace to our neighbors. Both States can live in peace with one another and cooperate for the welfare of their inhabitants."

This was followed by Ben Gurion's statement in December 1947: "If the Arab citizen will feel at home in our state ... if the state will help him in a truthful and dedicated way to reach the economic, social, and cultural level of the Jewish community, then Arab distrust will accordingly subside and a bridge will be built to a Semitic, Jewish-Arab alliance."

In contrast, Arab leaders like Azzam Pasha, Secretary-General of the Arab League, had their sights set on driving the Jews into the sea: "It will be a war of annihilation. It will be a momentous massacre in history that will be talked about like the massacres of the Mongols or the Crusades." (As quoted in an interview in the Akhbar Al-Yom newspaper, October 11, 1947.)

Speaking to the U.N. Security Council on April 16, 1948, Jamal Husseini stated: "The representative of the Jewish Agency told us yesterday that they were not the attackers, that the Arabs had begun the fighting. We did not deny this. We told the whole world that we were going to fight."

The Arab nations did fight - and lost. And while the fledgling state of Israel absorbed 800,000 Jewish refugees who were expelled from surrounding Muslim lands, these same countries made no effort to absorb the 600,000 Arab refugees who fled Israel. Sadly, to this day, there are Palestinian refugee camps in Arab countries like Lebanon, while the inhabitants of Gaza lived in oppressive conditions when it was under Egyptian control after 1948.

But truth and justice matter little to the U.N. General Assembly when it comes to Israel, and so, November 29, which was once an important day in the history of the United Nations, has become a day of infamy.

Dr. Michael Brown, a Jewish believer in Jesus, is a biblical scholar, apologist, worldwide speaker, and activist. He is the host of the nationally syndicated, talk radio program "Line of Fire," and he serves as president of FIRE School of Ministry in Concord, NC, as well as adjunct professor at a number of seminaries. He is the author of 21 books, most recently "The Real Kosher Jesus."

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network,, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




What's your feeling about the James Comey/Loretta Lynch/Hillary Clinton/email server scandal?





  NFL maintains status quo on anthem policy
Sessions defends Comey firing, ties it to Clinton email case
Trump accuses Democrat of fabricating fallen soldier story
Manhunt underway after 3 killed at Maryland office shooting
Swiss executive asks voters to reject paid paternity leave


Gowdy: Comey needs to be in the hot seat again over Clinton
Obama WH knew about Russian bribery plot before uranium deal
Vets' lawsuit: 3 U.S. companies funded terror in Iraq
Mandalay Bay security guard resurfaces on 'Ellen DeGeneres Show'
Poll shows Roy Moore, Doug Jones neck-and-neck in Alabama Senate race


Cartoon of the Day