Would another Obama term push the U.S. 'over the edge'?

Monday, September 24, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-family leader and conservative activist says President Obama has compiled a lengthy list of violations against the Constitution during his first term of office, making the prospect of a second term "frightening."

Robert KnightRobert Knight is a senior fellow at The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) and a syndicated columnist. In his recent column titled "Trashing the Constitution," he cites a lengthy list of examples where Obama has violated the Constitution, including launching an illegal war in Libya, undermining the nation's armed forces, refusing to enforce laws he does not like, forcing Americans to buy health insurance, and violating religious freedom.

Knight believes Obama would really be emboldened if he is elected to a second term.

"The sheer unconcern for Congress' constitutional powers if he gets re-elected will be magnified several times, which is frightening," the conservative offers. "We're right on the edge of losing our constitutional republic, and I'm wondering if a president who doesn't respect the Constitution and is emboldened by a re-election might just push us over that edge."

Knight believes the only way to stop Obama in a second term would be to elect a conservative-controlled House and a Senate willing to do whatever it takes to stop Obama's continued trampling on the Constitution.

"One is the power of the purse, which originates in the House. The Senate could use its power of advise and consent to thwart really radical appointments," the ACRU senior fellow explains. "They can also bring agency officials to heel, subpoena them to appear before them and explain why they're violating the Constitution."

In the event Obama is re-elected, Knight concludes that a truly conservative takeover of Congress would give him some hope for the country's future.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Would you keep your unborn child if you were certain he/she has Down syndrome?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Federal court: Arkansas can block Planned Parenthood money
Texas governor suggests 'bathroom bill' likely dead for now
Critic: Removing Confederate statues was wrong
  National Parks Service ends ban on disposable water bottles
  Driver of Texas trailer indicted for 10 passengers' deaths
  Governor: 37 killed in gun battle at small Venezuela prison

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Where is the corporate disavowal of Black Lives Matter?
Laura Ingraham: Politics to blame for 'newfound outrage' over Confederate statues
Angry white boys
University provides 87 different programs to fight 'bias' on campus
The big list: U.S epidemic of endangered monuments (This is not about racial healing)

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Institute fears U.N. treaty could be pro-abortion

A United Nations treaty working its way through the U.S. Senate reveals a hidden agenda that could be dangerous to children in the womb.