Another blind ObamaCare implementation

Wednesday, January 9, 2013
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

A healthcare advocate contends that the government shouldn't have proposed new rules for ObamaCare at the end of the year, when Americans were busy celebrating the holidays.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced four proposed rules for ObamaCare during the holiday season, placing them up for public review and comments between Thanksgiving and the New Year and giving a minimum of 30 days for evaluation.

Brase, Twila (CCHF)Twila Brase, president of the Citizens' Council for Health Freedom (CCHF), reports that the proposals included new rules for insurance fees, a requirement for exchanges to offer national health plans, and guidelines to increase costs and include higher premiums.

"This is bad for the public process. There is reason why we have the Administrative Procedures Act that requires the administration to give the public long enough to actually read, digest, and respond to the regulations in order to protect the American people from regulators doing some things that are outside the law or going further than they should," Brase submits.

"They should issue rules only at a time when they know that the public has the time to read them and the time to respond to them," the CCHF president continues. "Otherwise, the public is just getting another implementation of ObamaCare that we have to pass before we can actually know what's in it."

Although the review period was short, Brase says many Americans urged the HHS to extend it for better review of the nearly 750 pages of new material. Her group hopes to obtain that.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to a federal judge blocking Trump's order withholding funding for uncooperative 'sanctuary cities'?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump tax plan leaves Congress, Ryan with heavy lift
Texas poised to pass 'sanctuary city' ban with jail penalty
  Trump says Mexico, Canada opposed NAFTA pull-out
  Syrian media: Israel attacked installation near Damascus
IRS, postal inspectors raid Benny Hinn Ministries

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Christian university must celebrate ‘panromantic’ gender identity, LGBTQ students demand
Dad sent to prison for homeschooling his kids
NYT op-ed argues rioters have been in the right
How Hillary doomed her ‘inevitable presidency’
At cowardly Berkeley, the mob wins again

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Advice for Rick Perry re: refunding excess tax money

An economist sees an issue in Texas Governor Rick Perry's push to refund tax money it collects but does not spend.