Hard-line Dems = bad news for DACAs

Wednesday, October 11, 2017
 | 
Chad Groening, Jody Brown (OneNewsNow.com)

Schumer and Pelosi seatedThe head of an immigration reform think tank expects Democrats will be totally inflexible in any negotiations with President Trump regarding the status of DACA recipients. A conservative columnist argues that stance will only hurt the "DACAs."

President Donald Trump has made it clear to congressional leaders that his immigration priorities must be enacted in exchange for extending protection from deportation to hundreds of thousands of young illegals, who fall under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Trump's list of priorities includes overhauling the country's "green card" system, a crackdown on unaccompanied minors entering the country, and building his promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Democratic leaders Senator Chuck Schumer and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi say the president's immigrant "wish list" is dead on arrival. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, says that approach to the president's plans doesn't bode well for DACA recipients.

Krikorian

"Chuck Schumer has said he's willing to entertain the idea of a little bit of phony border measures – not the wall but maybe drones or that kind of nonsense ... but that's it," he explains.

Krikorian argues that Democrats want to use the DACA issue as pretext for demanding a much bigger amnesty – one that would grant amnesty to an unknown number of individuals. They would rather do that "than deal with this finite, fixed number of people whose work permits are going to be expiring in about five months," he states.

According to Krikorian, Schumer and Pelosi seem to think they are in a position of strength – which he says they really aren't.

"[They] are saying We want everything right now, on our terms. We're not going to give you anything – end of negotiation, period," he states. "That's a recipe for not having any bill get passed by the Congress and end up on the president's desk – and what that means is that the Democrats will be responsible for the DACAs losing their work permits."

Those DACA permits will begin expiring in March.

Putting the Dems in their place

Cheryl Chumley – a columnist for The Washington Times – says the fact that Schumer and Pelosi aren't happy about Trump's immigration priorities means "the White House is doing something right."

Chumley

Chumley is hopeful Republicans in Congress don't cave to Democrats' complaints. "Let's leave the Dems where they belong – in the dark pit of the minority party, struggling for relevancy and legislative steam," she writes.

The columnist also takes issue with the Democratic leaders' attempt to make it look like Trump didn't follow through on his commitment to them during a meeting that the border wall wasn't part of the deal. Their belief that that was the case, says Chumley, is their own fault.

"[They] mistook this meeting for something politically significant – something akin to a policy etched in stone. That's their missteps," she writes.

"Now that they've got to try and save face by acting as if Trump were betraying their political agreement is called Just Due. Now that they're angry at Trump and characterizing the White House immigration plan as a deal-breaker is called a Good Deal.

"It means, for conservatives, the plan's headed in the right direction."


10/12/2017 - One additional comment from Krikorian added (paragraph #6).

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What were the most outlandish 'fake news' reports during the 2016 election cycle?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Copter on quake mission flips in Mexico, kills 13 on ground
LeBron says he 'will definitely not shut up and dribble'
Biden, in public and private, tiptoes toward a 2020 run
Self-proclaimed 'icon' Adam Rippon takes final Olympic skate
Trump claims indictment proves 'no collusion'
Mueller charges Russians with meddling in 2016 race
Trump focuses on first responders after Florida shooting

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Supreme Court holds private meeting to discuss Trump's appeal on DACA decision
Trump pushes back against 'Fake News Media' coverage of Russian meddling
Military now faced with watching for enemy bacteria
McMaster: Evidence is 'Incontrovertible' that Russia MeddlMcMaster: Evidence is 'incontrovertible' that Russia meddled in 2016 Election
Be like Michael Jordan? Not at Air Force Academy

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Kasich 2020: Pro-immigration, pro-environment, anti-nationalism

John KasichGov. John Kasich (R-Ohio) believes the third time’s a charm as he reportedly strategizes for a White House run on the GOP ticket for 2020, and he’s adopting a campaign platform right out of the Democratic Party’s playbook – complete with open immigration and climate change alarmism as its hallmarks, while moving away from nationalism.