Assisted suicide acceptable in California?

Tuesday, January 29, 2013
 | 
(OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-life advocate says the increasing acceptance of assisted suicide is just a "symptom" of a culture that has lost its morality.

Macias

California prosecutors are showing more leniency to individuals who assist with suicide. The Los Angeles Times reports that twice last year, no charges were filed in cases where a husband or wife assisted in the other's suicides.

Steve Macias, director of Cherish California's Children, tells OneNewsNow that cases under the state's assisted suicide law rarely head to trial, as prosecutors do not believe most jurors would find a spouse who assisted in the suicide of a husband or wife guilty of murder.

"Self-murder is just as much murder as any other type of murder is, because we don't have the right to kill ourselves," Macias insists. "These people who are under duress from illness or from mental instability should not be allowed to kill themselves. This is a symptom of an immoral culture."

Judges have also handed down sentences that are less harsh, such as months of probation rather than jail time. Some have even ruled that assisted suicide is not murder, since the individual is assisting someone who wants to die.

"It's part of this idea that murder is something that we can control," the pro-lifer laments. "A culture that kills 3,000 children every day is going to lead to a culture that murders under all these flowery and choice terms."

Prosecutors did not charge a San Diego man who sat by his wife as she ate applesauce that contained more than 30 sleeping pills. And in the case of an elderly Palm Springs man, officials claim they could not prove he disconnected his wife's oxygen supply.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should vaccination of children be decided by parents/guardians – or by government regulations?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

U.S.-allied force takes Syria's largest oil field from IS
Japanese PM Abe appears headed to impressive election win
Astros top Yankees 4-0 in ALCS Game 7, meet Dodgers in World Series
Pliskova beats Williams for first win at WTA Finals
Directors guild files disciplinary charges against Weinstein
5 former presidents appear together for hurricane relief

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Jemele Hill: 'I deserve a suspension' from ESPN for controversial tweets
Report: #NeverTrump State Department aides 'boxing out' America Firsters
Bill O’Reilly responds to latest NY Times 'smear piece' about massive sexual misconduct settlement
US pushes Saudi Arabia, Iraq on united front to counter Iran
Property-rights advocates to Trump: Restore Americans' land rights

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Making an option a requirement

As Washington state lawmakers consider a bill that would force coverage of abortion, a pro-lifer asserts that proponents of such language will have a fight on their hands.