Assisted suicide acceptable in California?

Tuesday, January 29, 2013
 | 
(OneNewsNow.com)

A pro-life advocate says the increasing acceptance of assisted suicide is just a "symptom" of a culture that has lost its morality.

Macias

California prosecutors are showing more leniency to individuals who assist with suicide. The Los Angeles Times reports that twice last year, no charges were filed in cases where a husband or wife assisted in the other's suicides.

Steve Macias, director of Cherish California's Children, tells OneNewsNow that cases under the state's assisted suicide law rarely head to trial, as prosecutors do not believe most jurors would find a spouse who assisted in the suicide of a husband or wife guilty of murder.

"Self-murder is just as much murder as any other type of murder is, because we don't have the right to kill ourselves," Macias insists. "These people who are under duress from illness or from mental instability should not be allowed to kill themselves. This is a symptom of an immoral culture."

Judges have also handed down sentences that are less harsh, such as months of probation rather than jail time. Some have even ruled that assisted suicide is not murder, since the individual is assisting someone who wants to die.

"It's part of this idea that murder is something that we can control," the pro-lifer laments. "A culture that kills 3,000 children every day is going to lead to a culture that murders under all these flowery and choice terms."

Prosecutors did not charge a San Diego man who sat by his wife as she ate applesauce that contained more than 30 sleeping pills. And in the case of an elderly Palm Springs man, officials claim they could not prove he disconnected his wife's oxygen supply.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

If accused of praying for your elected government officials, how would you plead?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump asserts all agree he has complete power to pardon
Bush, Cuban: Trump dragging down GOP, billionaires
Next Minneapolis police chief has deep community roots
Actor John Heard, of 'Home Alone' movies, dies at 71
Strong aftershocks test nerves on Greek island after quake
More Israeli troops sent to West Bank, placed on high alert
Trump to attend commissioning of USS Gerald R. Ford
German runaway girl who converted to Islam is found in Iraq

LATEST FROM THE WEB

GOP, Dems agree on sweeping sanctions bill -- including provision Trump opposed
Report: McConnell to set Obamacare repeal vote for Tuesday
Senate Minority Leader Schumer's approval ratings take a dive
'Bible Answer Man' urged by founder's family to resign
Trump: USS Ford 'A 100,000-ton message to the world'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Making an option a requirement

As Washington state lawmakers consider a bill that would force coverage of abortion, a pro-lifer asserts that proponents of such language will have a fight on their hands.