RU486 over the counter a 'recipe for disaster'

Friday, March 10, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

RU-486 worldwide pushA group of pro-abortion academics is calling for further loosening of restrictions on the abortion pill RU486 but ignores valid concerns about the safety of women.

A little less than a year ago, the Food and Drug Administration eased restrictions on use of the drug, reduced the dosage, extended use of it from the seventh to the tenth week of pregnancy, and loosened qualifications for prescribers. Dr. Randall K. O'Bannon with National Right to Life tells OneNewsNow a group of medical professionals wants restrictions further reduced.

"They've got a group of folks together who signed this article in the New England Journal of Medicine arguing that they want it to be able to be sold at retail pharmacies or be available through online mail order instead of having to go through procedures that are there for the safety of women," he says.

The group of doctors call themselves the Mifeprex REMS Study Group – and according to the NRLC spokesman, there's nothing in their arguments dealing with making the abortion drug safer for women.

The problem for the study group, O'Bannon adds, is that relatively few doctors are willing to terminate the lives of preborn babies – and that is why that group hopes to make it more easily available without a doctor's prescription.

"Are these doctors [who signed the article] going to tell them about the 19 women who have taken these drugs and died?" O'Bannon asks. "Are they going to tell them about the thousands who end up hospitalized with ruptured ectopic pregnancies or with hemorrhaging?"

He also finds it "very interesting" that those who signed onto the article aren't just a random group of doctors. "These are sort of like academic abortion all-stars," he explains.

O'Bannon says the article's premise is best described as "a recipe for disaster."

NRLC says killing an unborn baby whose heart has already begun to beat is "the only purpose for which the sponsor [of RU486] ever sought U.S. government approval."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

The conclusion you draw from California's left-wing leadership is…(choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump signs order sweeping away Obama-era climate policies
Nunes won't leave Russia probe; Ryan says no need to
  Public television chief says Trump budget would hit options
  Campus 'free speech zones' face new round of scrutiny
City leaders defy WH threat on 'sanctuary' policies
ICE: Rape suspect's father arrested after immigration review

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Christian student suspended after challenging Muslim prof’s claim that Jesus wasn’t crucified
Are facts now considered 'white supremacism'?
Racism: Its true cause and sure solution
College diversity council posts fake racist flyers to encourage ‘dialogue’
Let the leggings be banned! (Burqas, too)

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Polls show declining defense of Roe v. Wade

women regret abortion protester signRoe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized terminating preborn children, isn’t an absolute among Americans - and as a poll shows, shouldn't be among politicians either.