Senator: 60-vote rule protects pro-life agenda

Friday, October 6, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Lindsey GrahamThe U.S. Senate will soon debate a proposed ban on abortions at 20 weeks – but according to a high-profile senator, it may be years before such a ban becomes law.

The House on Wednesday passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 36) by a vote of 237-189, sending the bill to the Senate where it will take 60 votes even to consider the measure. While proponents of the bill want to change the filibuster policy so only a majority vote will be required, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) (above) explained during a press conference why he's opposed to doing so.

"The best way to protect the pro-life issue and to pass this bill is to build consensus and get 60 votes," stated the senator. "And I can tell you that during the Obama years, there was a pretty radical pro-abortion agenda that was stopped time and time again because of the 60-vote requirement."

A bill banning partial-birth abortions took years and several court challenges to gain passage and Supreme Court approval. According to Graham, enough senators were educated during that process to eventually pass the measure. If H.R. 36 were to undergo a similarly long process, even then the legislation would be challenged, said Graham.

"So we're trying to convince the courts that legislative bodies like the Congress and at the state level have a legitimate and compelling state interest to protect a child at the fifth month of development from excruciating pain that would come from an abortion," he stated.

In Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in 1973, the Supreme Court ruled viability of the preborn baby could be a legal issue, and science tells the public more about viability now than it did then.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to the announcement that compulsively playing video games now qualifies as a mental health condition?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump digs in on immigration amid family separation crisis
Strong quake near Osaka, Japan, kills 4, knocks over walls
Justices: No definitive ruling on partisan districts
Merkel, allies avert collision for now in German migrant row
Compulsive video-game playing could be mental health problem

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Suspect dead, 20 injured in shooting at a New Jersey festival
Anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok willing to testify before Congress — and leave no stone unturned
Democrats gain entry to NJ immigration detention center after arguing with cops, 'literally banging on the door'
Trump's co-author predicted president would resign last year
One dead, 22 hurt in NJ arts festival shooting

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Pro-lifer: Liberal state AG out to stop clinic ultrasounds

hand with ultrasound wandNew York's attorney general, who filed suit in June 2016 against peaceful pro-life counselors outside a clinic in Jamaica, New York, is now trying to drive New York City's largest pro-life organization out of business.